当前位置: X-MOL 学术Childhood › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Parallel lines? Childhood discourses emphasized by the children’s rights movement and the emerging field of children’s rights studies
Childhood ( IF 1.802 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-30 , DOI: 10.1177/0907568219896610
Daniella Bendo 1
Affiliation  

This article is a response to Karl Hanson’s call for the emancipation of children’s rights studies from the children’s rights movement. It explores the emergence of the children’s rights movement and children’s rights studies and analyzes some of the key childhood discourses that are emphasized by these two different approaches. As a way to understand why Hanson calls for emancipation, and in an attempt to begin to emancipate children’s rights studies, the article works to deepen current and future spaces for discussion in the field.

中文翻译:

平行线?儿童权利运动和新兴的儿童权利研究领域所强调的童年话语

本文是对卡尔·汉森(Karl Hanson)呼吁从儿童权利运动中解放儿童权利研究的回应。它探讨了儿童权利运动和儿童权利研究的兴起,并分析了这两种不同方法所强调的一些关键的童年话语。为了理解汉森为何要求解放,并试图开始解放儿童权利研究,本文试图加深当前和未来在该领域的讨论空间。
更新日期:2019-12-30
down
wechat
bug