当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Australian Feminist Studies
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reading the Sexual Economy of Academic Freedom with Sarah Kofman and Jacques Derrida: A Feminist Deconstruction of Kant's Concept of the University
Australian Feminist Studies ( IF 1.170 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-29 , DOI: 10.1080/08164649.2019.1698285 Lenka Vráblíková 1
Australian Feminist Studies ( IF 1.170 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-29 , DOI: 10.1080/08164649.2019.1698285 Lenka Vráblíková 1
Affiliation
ABSTRACT This article revisits Sarah Kofman and Jacques Derrida's work on Immanuel Kant in order to contribute to the theorisations of the ethics and politics of sexuality at universities today. It asks: how does phallogocentrism operate in the discourse of the university which we have inherited from Kant? And how can an understanding of the sexual forces woven into this discourse help us unravel and complicate the paradoxes that currently define the concept and the practice of academic freedom? By interrogating academic freedom from within an analysis of the university's sexual economy, this article aims to contribute to feminist critique with a view to renewing university discourses and practices. It shows that the contract between the nation state and scholars upon which the university is founded is not only financial or sociopolitical but also sexual. It argues that academic freedom must be conceived not as a university subject's right to speak or act freely but as a continuous ethical relationship to others – where a critique of the university's alleged sexual indifference remains paramount.
中文翻译:
与莎拉·科夫曼和雅克·德里达一起阅读学术自由的性经济:康德大学概念的女性主义解构
摘要 本文回顾了莎拉·科夫曼和雅克·德里达对伊曼纽尔·康德的研究,以期为当今大学的性伦理和政治理论做出贡献。它问:在我们从康德那里继承的大学话语中,男性中心主义是如何运作的?对交织在这个话语中的性力量的理解如何帮助我们解开和复杂化目前定义学术自由的概念和实践的悖论?通过从大学性经济分析中质疑学术自由,本文旨在为女权主义批判做出贡献,以期更新大学话语和实践。它表明,民族国家与大学成立所依据的学者之间的契约不仅是财务或社会政治的,而且是性的。它认为,学术自由不应被视为大学学科自由发言或行动的权利,而应被视为与他人的持续道德关系——对大学所谓的性冷漠的批评仍然是最重要的。
更新日期:2019-11-29
中文翻译:
与莎拉·科夫曼和雅克·德里达一起阅读学术自由的性经济:康德大学概念的女性主义解构
摘要 本文回顾了莎拉·科夫曼和雅克·德里达对伊曼纽尔·康德的研究,以期为当今大学的性伦理和政治理论做出贡献。它问:在我们从康德那里继承的大学话语中,男性中心主义是如何运作的?对交织在这个话语中的性力量的理解如何帮助我们解开和复杂化目前定义学术自由的概念和实践的悖论?通过从大学性经济分析中质疑学术自由,本文旨在为女权主义批判做出贡献,以期更新大学话语和实践。它表明,民族国家与大学成立所依据的学者之间的契约不仅是财务或社会政治的,而且是性的。它认为,学术自由不应被视为大学学科自由发言或行动的权利,而应被视为与他人的持续道德关系——对大学所谓的性冷漠的批评仍然是最重要的。