Since 2005, South Africa’s post-apartheid state has opted to impose inclusive business model arrangements between land claimant communities and private sector partners to ensure the “successful” resolution of claims involving prime agricultural land. This approach was deemed compatible to achieve both restorative justice imperatives and capacitation or entrepreneurial objectives. Using the settlement of the Moletele restitution case as reference, this paper argues that these types of arrangements tend to entrench the hegemony of the state’s belief in the productivist, large-scale farming model as the most viable approach to rural restitution. These initiatives also calibrate the role of the state, private sector and restitution beneficiaries into configurations that fail to facilitate genuine levels of restorative justice or capacitation, thus fuelling the calls towards more retributive forms of land redistribution.

自2005年以来，南非的种族隔离后国家选择在土地索偿者社区与私营部门合作伙伴之间实施包容性商业模式安排，以确保“成功”解决涉及主要农业用地的索偿。人们认为这种方法既可以实现恢复性司法要求，又可以实现能力建设或创业目标。本文以Moletele归还案的解决为参考，认为这些类型的安排倾向于巩固国家对生产主义，大规模耕作模式的信念，这是最可行的农村归还方法。这些举措也将国家，私营部门和归还受益人的作用校准为无法促进真正的恢复性司法或人为能力的结构，