Our hypothesis is that ecological transformation involves socio-environmental communities formed through joint action on a material environment, which can be set as a conjonction of practices between senses and meanings — giving birth to landscapes, life environments and matter of all kinds — analyzed in the context of solidarities — as well as conflicts of territoriality, in which human collectives associate with living matter and the environment to fight against other uses of space or to implement new ways of seeing nature. The environment as a collective work then becomes a self-sustaining call to action, which enhances the skills and legitimacy of the actors (citizens, formal and informal collectives) and their role in socio-ecological transition. We thus witness emerging environmental citizenships of a new kind that deviate from political militancy and testify to civic engagement in ordinary practices, a collective environmentalism that contributes to public action and democracy. What we call ordinary environmentalism includes environmental alliances and socio-environmental communities (with cats and cockroaches, mushrooms and noise interpretation, narrating, creating music, etc.) that have hitherto been considered negligible and we emphasize their value in democratizing the co-production of everyday and ordinary environments. One way to do this is to admit – as many scholars in the field of biosemiotics have done – that nature is made up of « signs, interpretations and meanings » (Wheeler 2014: 375) and to increase our knowledge of an aesthetic experience related to nature. We will deploy these issues on a theoretical level through the conceptual expression of environmental forms and the concept of immunity. Based on an interdisciplinary research, the related fieldwork includes a hundred non-directive interviews and observations conducted in several French cities (Paris, Rennes, Lyon), in specific neighborhoods such as the public housing district of Blosne in Rennes and the Croix-Rousse district in Lyon, or with specific associations to reflect the role of public institutions in the socio-natural arrangements of groups of inhabitants in the cities of France.

中文翻译：

---

城市中的动物

我们的假设是，生态转型涉及通过对物质环境的共同行动而形成的社会-环境共同体，可以将其设定为感觉和意义之间实践的结合，从而产生了景观，生活环境和各种物质。团结的背景以及领土的冲突，在这种冲突中，人类集体与生物和环境联系在一起，以与空间的其他用途作斗争或采取新的自然观方式。然后，作为集体工作的环境成为行动的自我维持要求，从而增强了行为者（公民，正式和非正式集体）的技能和合法性，以及他们在社会生态转型中的作用。因此，我们目睹了新兴的新型环境公民身份，其背离了政治战斗力，并证明了公民参与普通做法是一种集体环境主义，有助于公共行动和民主。我们所谓的普通环境主义包括迄今为止被认为可以忽略不计的环境联盟和社会环境社区（包括猫和蟑螂，蘑菇和噪音的解释，叙述，创作音乐等），我们强调它们在使共同生产的民主化方面的价值。日常和普通环境。做到这一点的一种方法是，就像生物符号学领域的许多学者所做的那样，承认自然是由“符号，解释和含义”组成的（Wheeler 2014：375），并增加了我们对与之相关的审美经验的认识。性质。我们将通过环境形式的概念表达和免疫力概念在理论层面上部署这些问题。根据一项跨学科研究，相关的现场工作包括在法国的几个城市（巴黎，雷恩，里昂），在特定地区，例如雷恩的布洛斯涅公共住房区和克罗伊-鲁塞区，进行了一百次非指导性访谈和观察。在里昂，或与特定协会合作以反映公共机构在法国城市居民群体的社会自然安排中的作用。