当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Documentation › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The trouble with diverse books, part II: an informational pragmatic analysis
Journal of Documentation ( IF 2.034 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-12 , DOI: 10.1108/jd-06-2020-0112
E.E. Lawrence

Purpose

Diverse books is a fundamentally political concept that performs particular normative work in discursive space. Part I of this project demonstrated that this was the case, further claiming that descriptive conceptual analysis was therefore methodologically inadequate to the task of defining the term. The purpose of this paper – Part II of II – is to advance a universal account of diverse books using an alternative form of conceptual analysis designed to suit the needs and commitments of LIS scholarship.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper proposes and deploys a new method called informational pragmatic analysis, through which one develops accounts of political concepts in terms of their legitimate aims and benefits vis-à-vis informational justice.

Findings

Diverse books are those systematically devalorized literary works we must make an ameliorative effort to promote in order to advance informational justice for oppressed persons in particular. These works exist on a contextually specific spectrum of moral urgency. A critical task for the diverse books movement is therefore to determine through democratic deliberation which (types of) books are most urgently in need of promotion under varying sociopolitical conditions.

Originality/value

In addition to proposing a new analytical methodology for LIS, the paper articulates and defends a pragmatic account of diverse books that resists regressive misappropriation. This further lays the groundwork for future critical interrogations of the activities of various agents and agencies of print, both within and beyond the library.



中文翻译:

各种书籍带来的麻烦,第二部分:信息实用分析

目的

多样化的书籍是一个基本的政治概念,在话语空间中执行特定的规范性工作。该项目的第一部分证明了这种情况,并进一步声称,描述性概念分析因此在方法上不足以定义该术语。本文的目的(第二部分的第二部分)旨在通过使用另一种形式的概念分析来满足LIS奖学金的需求和承诺,从而促进对各种书籍的普遍了解。

设计/方法/方法

本文提出并部署了一种称为信息实用主义分析的新方法,通过该方法,人们可以根据政治概念的合法目的和相对于信息正义的利益来阐述政治概念。

发现

多样化的书籍是那些被系统地贬低的文学作品,我们必须做出改善的努力,以促进特别是被压迫者的信息公正。这些作品存在于特定的道德紧迫感背景下。因此,多样化书籍运动的一项关键任务是通过民主审议来确定在变化的社会政治条件下最迫切需要推广的书籍(类型)。

创意/价值

除了为LIS提出一种新的分析方法外,本文还阐明并捍卫了抵制回归式盗用的各种书籍的实用说明。这进一步为将来对图书馆内外各种印刷品代理商和代理机构的活动进行关键性的询问奠定了基础。

更新日期:2020-08-12
down
wechat
bug