当前位置: X-MOL 学术Trauma, Violence, & Abuse › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Scoping Review of the Trauma Recovery and Empowerment Model (TREM)
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse ( IF 6.595 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-10 , DOI: 10.1177/1524838020967862
Melanie Masin-Moyer 1 , Jessica Cho Kim 1 , Malitta Engstrom 1 , Phyllis Solomon 1
Affiliation  

The link between interpersonal trauma and negative biopsychosocial outcomes has been well-documented. Integrated treatments that address trauma, mental health, and substance use among women with trauma histories have been found to be more effective than treatments that focus separately on these concerns. Since the early 2000s, the Trauma Recovery and Empowerment Model (TREM) has been described as a “promising” integrated trauma group therapy for women. Despite widespread recognition and implementation of TREM, its effectiveness has not been clearly established. The present scoping review is the first systematic effort to describe the extant literature on TREM and aims to provide an understanding of TREM’s effectiveness by organizing and synthesizing the available empirical data. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, SW Abstracts, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Quantitative dissertation findings not published elsewhere and peer-reviewed journal articles published in English that reported outcomes from TREM intervention research with adult women were included. Twelve of the initial 385 publications identified met the inclusion criteria and reported data from nine studies. TREM demonstrated statistically significant effects on posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, psychological/psychosomatic distress, and substance use. A more limited set of findings suggests that TREM may also be associated with additional gains, including self-esteem, relationship power, social support, attachment, and spiritual well-being. Future research should replicate findings, use random assignment to groups, involve larger sample sizes and more representative samples, examine optimal duration, and identify components that facilitate change.



中文翻译:

创伤恢复和赋权模型 (TREM) 的范围审查

人际创伤与消极的生物心理社会结果之间的联系已得到充分证明。已发现针对有创伤史的女性的创伤、心理健康和物质使用的综合治疗比单独关注这些问题的治疗更有效。自 2000 年代初以来,创伤恢复和赋权模型 (TREM) 被描述为针对女性的“有前途的”综合创伤团体治疗。尽管 TREM 得到广泛认可和实施,但其有效性尚未明确确立。目前的范围审查是描述现有 TREM 文献的第一次系统性努力,旨在通过组织和综合可用的经验数据来提供对 TREM 有效性的理解。在系统评价的首选报告项目和范围界定评价的元分析扩展的指导下,使用 PubMed、PsycINFO、SW Abstracts、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了系统搜索。包括未在其他地方发表的定量论文结果和以英文发表的同行评审期刊文章,这些文章报告了成年女性 TREM 干预研究的结果。最初确定的 385 篇出版物中有 12 篇符合纳入标准,并报告了 9 项研究的数据。TREM 对创伤后应激障碍、焦虑、心理/心身困扰和物质使用具有统计学意义的影响。一组更有限的研究结果表明,TREM 也可能与额外的收获有关,包括自尊、关系力量、社会支持、依恋、和精神上的幸福。未来的研究应该重复研究结果,使用随机分配到组,涉及更大的样本量和更具代表性的样本,检查最佳持续时间,并确定促进变化的组成部分。

更新日期:2021-01-14
down
wechat
bug