This essay was first published on Emi Koyama’s website eminism.org in 2000. Koyama examines how constructs of universal womanhood have operated to exclude many from feminist spaces. Much of the language surrounding trans identities and bodies has changed in the 20 years since its authorship. Yet, the central tensions, illustrated through a critical account of the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival’s trans-exclusion policy, remain. Koyama’s powerful argument that ‘no-penis’ policies are inherently racist and classist continues to offer an important challenge to white feminists, be they trans or cis.

中文翻译：

---

究竟是谁的女权主义？跨性别包容性辩论中不言而喻的种族主义

这篇文章于 2000 年首次发表在 Emi Koyama 的网站 eminism.org 上。 Koyama 研究了普遍女性的建构如何运作以将许多人排除在女权主义空间之外。自从它成为作者以来的 20 年里，围绕跨性别身份和身体的大部分语言都发生了变化。然而，通过对密歇根女子音乐节的跨性别排斥政策的批判性描述，中心的紧张局势仍然存在。小山关于“无阴茎”政策本质上是种族主义和阶级主义的有力论点继续对白人女权主义者提出重要挑战，无论她们是反式还是顺式。