Contributing to debates over relations between the collective and juridified regulation of labor, this article analyzes a rich case study in the Israeli construction sector to claim that juridification can spur unions and employers’ associations to initiate strategic and inclusive change. By subsuming processes of juridification into traditional IR frameworks and embracing its logic and practices, the corporatist social partners broaden the relevance of collective labor relations to workers otherwise excluded from direct union representation. In this way, while not increasing union density or improving wages, these ‘traditional’ IR actors reassert their monopolistic control over worker and employer representation, as well as over the sectoral labor market.

文章针对集体劳动规范化与司法规范之间关系的辩论作出了贡献，分析了以色列建筑行业的大量案例研究，声称司法化可以刺激工会和雇主协会发起战略性和包容性变革。通过将司法化过程纳入传统的投资者关系框架，并接受其逻辑和实践，法人社会伙伴扩大了集体劳动关系与原本被排除在直接工会代表制范围之外的工人的相关性。这样，在不增加工会密度或提高工资的同时，这些“传统的”投资者关系参与者重申了对工人和雇主代表以及部门劳动力市场的垄断控制权。