To conclude the discussion of breath and breathing in the foregoing contributions, this comment sets out from a critical perspective on embodiment. For a being that breathes out and in, should we not add to embodiment its complement of vaporisation? Breath, after all, is fluid, animate and fundamental to human conviviality. While it can temporarily be put on hold, breath cannot be contained. That is why bodily breathing is unlike the ventilation of buildings. Moreover, breathing in and breathing out are dissimilar movements which cannot be reversed. This presents particular problems for those with breathing difficulties, above all in societies where speech, carried on the outbreath, is modelled on print, and where thought is attributed to a self whose powers of cognition transcend bodily experience. In place of the complementarity of self and body, we posit the soul as a vortex in which breathing, thinking, speech and song all flow into one another.

中文翻译：

---

关于呼吸和呼吸：总结性评论

为了结束上述贡献中对呼吸和呼吸的讨论，本评论从对具身的批判性角度出发。对于一个呼气和吸气的存在，我们不应该在具象上增加它的汽化补充吗？毕竟，呼吸是流动的、有生命力的，是人类欢乐的基础。虽然可以暂时搁置，但无法抑制呼吸。这就是为什么身体呼吸不同于建筑物的通风。而且，吸气和呼气是不同的动作，不能逆转。这给呼吸困难的人带来了特殊的问题，尤其是在这样的社会中，在这些社会中，通过呼气进行言语，以印刷品为模型，并且思想被归因于其认知能力超越身体经验的自我。代替自我与身体的互补，