A growing number of essays authored by anthropologists invoke the work of Emmanuel Levinas. The rise of this quiet tide deserves some reflection, not only because anthropological references to Levinas keep coming but also because very few of these efforts ever end up in discipline-specific journals. They tend to get pushed toward philosophical and theological venues. Why is this?

中文翻译：

---

关于列维纳斯和道德的一些思考：对阿尔维的回应

人类学家撰写的越来越多的论文引用了伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯的作品。这种平静浪潮的兴起值得反思，这不仅是因为人类学对莱维纳斯的引用不断出现，而且还因为这些努力中很少有人最终发表在特定学科的期刊上。他们倾向于被推向哲学和神学领域。为什么是这样？