Is it possible to write a publishable, peer-reviewed academic paper in a day? We attempted this task in 2016, motivated by a desire to find new ways of doing academic work in the face of our growing sense of alienation within the neoliberal academy. This article provides our analysis of academic alienation and an auto-ethnography of our experiment. We discuss four lessons learned: (1) knowledge as a social relation, (2) time and the academy, (3) gender and collaborative writing, and (4) the contradictions and possibilities of anarchy and authorship. We also offer practical advice for scholars looking to engage in similar collaborations.

中文翻译：

---

翻转学术会议，或我们如何在一天内撰写同行评审的期刊文章

是否有可能在一天内写出一篇可发表的、经过同行评审的学术论文？我们在 2016 年尝试了这项任务，其动机是希望在新自由主义学院内部日益疏远的情况下寻找新的学术工作方式。本文提供了我们对学术异化的分析和我们实验的自我民族志。我们讨论了四个经验教训：（1）作为社会关系的知识，（2）时间和学院，（3）性别和协作写作，以及（4）无政府状态和作者身份的矛盾和可能性。我们还为希望参与类似合作的学者提供实用建议。