当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the History of Economic Thought › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
UNDERSTANDING CLARENCE AYRES’S CRITICISM OF AN EMERGING MAINSTREAM AND BIRTHING INSTITUTIONALISM THROUGH THE 1930S AYRES-KNIGHT DEBATE
Journal of the History of Economic Thought ( IF 0.583 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-09 , DOI: 10.1017/s1053837219000336
Felipe Almeida , Marco Cavalieri

Clarence Ayres was a strong dissenting voice in US economics during the twentieth century. In the 1930s, a debate between Ayres and Frank Knight was published by the International Journal of Ethics. Although the debate focused on ethics, the evolution of economics was also discussed. This paper proposes an understanding of Ayres’s ideas based on the context in which he made them. This context is defined by the 1930s Ayres-Knight debate and the archival correspondence between Ayres and Knight during the 1930s.

中文翻译:

通过 1930 年代的艾尔斯-奈特辩论了解克拉伦斯·艾尔斯对新兴主流和诞生制度主义的批评

克拉伦斯·艾尔斯(Clarence Ayres)是 20 世纪美国经济界强烈反对的声音。1930 年代,艾尔斯和弗兰克奈特之间的一场辩论由国际伦理杂志. 尽管辩论集中在伦理上,但也讨论了经济学的演变。本文根据艾尔斯提出这些观点的背景提出了对艾尔斯观点的理解。这种背景是由 1930 年代的艾尔斯-奈特辩论以及 1930 年代艾尔斯和奈特之间的档案通信定义的。
更新日期:2020-09-09
down
wechat
bug