当前位置: X-MOL 学术IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Stakeholder Behavior in Disaster Risk Reduction at the Time of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Aceh
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science Pub Date : 2021-01-13 , DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/630/1/012015
Daisuke Sasaki 1 , Muhammad Iqbal 2 , Hizir Sofyan 2 , Nizamuddin Nizamuddin 3 , Muzailin Affan 3
Affiliation  

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, which was adopted at the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction in March 2015, positions understanding disaster risk as one of the four priorities for action. Also, access to disaster risk information is regarded as one of its seven global targets. Furthermore, it is widely recognized that the enhancement of disaster preparedness has great significance for achieving what is termed as “build back better.” The key research question of this study is: how does stakeholder behavior in disaster risk reduction (DRR) differ at the time of rehabilitation and reconstruction in Aceh? Since many different types of stakeholders participated in the rehabilitation and reconstruction process, there might exist some gaps in their behaviors. This study adopts text mining analysis as the methodology to examine the content of publications issued by DRR stakeholders. The authors utilize KH Coder as the analysis software and examine the three major documents, all of which have described the situation of rehabilitation and reconstruction in Aceh during the period from 2005 to 2008. As a result, we found that the Executing Agency of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction for Aceh and Nias (BRR) and the ADB tended to stress similar words in their reports, whereas Oxfam International behaved in a different manner. This may stem from the nature of each organization and, thus, we considered that the existence of coordinators who are well acquainted with every aspect of reconstruction and rehabilitation is much needed.



中文翻译:

亚齐恢复和重建时减灾中的利益相关者行为

2015 年 3 月第三次联合国世界减少灾害风险大会通过的《仙台减少灾害风险框架》将理解灾害风险定位为四项优先行动之一。此外,获取灾害风险信息被视为其七个全球目标之一。此外,人们普遍认为,加强备灾对于实现所谓的“重建得更好”具有重要意义。本研究的关键研究问题是:在亚齐恢复和重建时,利益相关者在减少灾害风险 (DRR) 方面的行为有何不同?由于许多不同类型的利益相关者参与了恢复和重建过程,他们的行为可能存在一些差距。本研究采用文本挖掘分析作为方法来检查 DRR 利益相关者发布的出版物的内容。作者利用 KH Coder 作为分析软件,查阅了三大文件,均描述了 2005 年至 2008 年期间亚齐省的恢复重建情况。亚齐和尼亚斯重建(BRR)和亚行在他们的报告中倾向于强调类似的词,而乐施会则以不同的方式表现。这可能源于每个组织的性质,因此,我们认为非常需要熟悉重建和恢复各个方面的协调员。作者利用 KH Coder 作为分析软件,查阅了三大文件,均描述了 2005 年至 2008 年期间亚齐省的恢复重建情况。亚齐和尼亚斯重建(BRR)和亚行在他们的报告中倾向于强调类似的词,而乐施会则以不同的方式表现。这可能源于每个组织的性质,因此,我们认为非常需要熟悉重建和恢复各个方面的协调员。作者利用 KH Coder 作为分析软件,查阅了三大文件,均描述了 2005 年至 2008 年期间亚齐省的恢复重建情况。亚齐和尼亚斯重建(BRR)和亚行在他们的报告中倾向于强调类似的词,而乐施会则以不同的方式表现。这可能源于每个组织的性质,因此,我们认为非常需要熟悉重建和恢复各个方面的协调员。因此,我们发现亚齐和尼亚斯 (BRR) 恢复和重建执行机构 (BRR) 和亚行在其报告中倾向于强调类似的词语,而乐施会则以不同的方式表现。这可能源于每个组织的性质,因此,我们认为非常需要熟悉重建和恢复各个方面的协调员的存在。因此,我们发现亚齐和尼亚斯 (BRR) 恢复和重建执行机构 (BRR) 和亚行在其报告中倾向于强调类似的词语,而乐施会则以不同的方式表现。这可能源于每个组织的性质,因此,我们认为非常需要熟悉重建和恢复各个方面的协调员的存在。

更新日期:2021-01-13
down
wechat
bug