当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Pacific Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Global IR through dialogue
The Pacific Review ( IF 2.074 ) Pub Date : 2019-02-08 , DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2018.1461680
Eun Yong-Soo 1
Affiliation  

Abstract

This article aims to address how to ensure a two-way ‘dialogue’ across ‘the West/non-West distinction’ in international studies. To this end, I first discuss three different approaches to dialogue, the Socratic, the Habermasian, and the Weberian, and clarify what kind of thing dialogue should be if it is to overcome the ‘West-non-West divide’ and transform the current ‘Western-centric’ IR into a global discipline. I argue that dialogue should be understood as reciprocal feedback from different perspectives for mutual learning. In order to achieve this goal (i.e. mutual learning), I call for an ‘instrumentalist’ approach to dialogue. To elucidate this point, I offer an empirical illustration. The focus here is on dialogue as mutual learning between Western-centric IR theory, more specifically constructivism, and the indigenous experience and knowledge of East Asia.



中文翻译:

通过对话实现全球投资者关系

摘要

本文旨在探讨如何确保国际研究中跨越“西方/非西方区别”的双向对话。为此,我首先讨论苏格拉底式,哈贝马斯式和韦伯式的三种对话方法,并阐明对话是要克服“西非非鸿沟”并改变当前的现状,应该是什么样的事情。将“以西方为中心”的投资者关系纳入全球学科。我认为对话应该被理解为从不同角度进行相互学习的相互反馈。为了实现这一目标(即相互学习),我呼吁采取“工具主义”的对话方式。为了阐明这一点,我提供了一个经验例证。这里的重点是对话,即以西方为中心的投资者关系理论(更具体地说是建构主义)与东亚的本地经验和知识之间的相互学习。

更新日期:2019-02-08
down
wechat
bug