This study aims to develop an evaluation index to evaluate the economic value among the values of the library and also attempts to measure the economic value of the library by performing a survey of the librarians and users at public libraries. The results of this research would likely encourage the librarians to feel increasingly confident about the library, while students and users, in general, would also likely be able to realize the economic value and presence of the library in more perceptive ways, thereby contributing to the activation of the library.,This study pertains to the development of an evaluation index for assessing the economic value of the library and, to evaluate the economic value of the library, has derived a preliminary evaluation index by collectively gathering and analyzing the domestic and foreign papers on the value of the library in its first phase. The preliminary evaluation index derived was verified by conducting three phases of Delphi survey by selecting ten experts. The survey questionnaire was developed to measure the economic value based on the final evaluation index derived from this study, and the economic value was measured against the perceptions of librarians and users of the public library.,The economic value of the library was divided into the four categories of the local economy’s value enhancement, namely, connection with the local community, human resources development, job creation and investment value enhancement for the librarians and users surveyed for assessment purposes. Consequently, the area of connection with the local community turned out to be the highest at 4.15, followed by 4.02 of the investment value improvement, 3.58 for the local economy’s value improvement and 3.50 for the human resources development and job creation, respectively. Furthermore, the respondents demonstrated the highest level of consensus on average on how the resource sharing by libraries has helped to reduce the economic burden for the residents as a matter of social value for the public library while believing that the libraries deliver a high level of return on social investments.,There are not that many studies conducted on the economic influence or the value of public libraries in Korea, and they are merely referenced in part if and when referenced to the overall value of the library. Given that, the research that focuses only on the economic value of the library must be carried out. In this respect, this research has been quite meaningful. The evaluation index developed in this research is likely to become a basic tool that can be applied to public libraries, as well as other types of libraries. Furthermore, the evaluation index developed through this research could be applied to nonprofit organizations, such as libraries, and would likely have a social ripple effect as a research that evaluates and presents the economic value of libraries. Accordingly, in this research, we have analyzed the list presented by the American Library Association and domestic research results, and have also structured the core details and derived the preliminary economic value index. Finally, 4 evaluation areas, 7 evaluation items and 22 evaluation indicators have been developed through the Delphi survey through three phases.

中文翻译：

---

基于用户和馆员认知的图书馆经济价值评价研究

本研究旨在制定一个评价指标来评价图书馆价值中的经济价值，并试图通过对公共图书馆馆员和用户的调查来衡量图书馆的经济价值。这项研究的结果可能会鼓励图书馆员对图书馆越来越有信心，而一般来说，学生和用户也可能能够以更敏锐的方式意识到图书馆的经济价值和存在，从而为图书馆的发展做出贡献。图书馆的激活。,本研究涉及制定评估图书馆经济价值的评价指标，并评估图书馆的经济价值，通过对一期图书馆价值的国内外论文进行汇总分析，得出初步评价指标。所推导出的初步评价指标，通过选取十名专家进行德尔福调查的三个阶段进行验证。调查问卷是根据本研究得出的最终评价指标来衡量经济价值的，经济价值是根据图书馆员和公共图书馆用户的看法来衡量的。,图书馆的经济价值分为地方经济价值提升的四类，即与当地社区的联系、人力资源开发、创造就业机会和为评估目的调查的图书馆员和用户的投资价值提升。最后，与当地社区的联系面积最高，为4.15，其次是投资价值提升4.02，当地经济价值提升3.58，人力资源开发和就业创造3.50。此外，受访者对图书馆的资源共享如何帮助减轻居民的经济负担作为公共图书馆的社会价值问题表现出了最高水平的共识，同时相信图书馆提供了高水平的回报关于社会投资。,关于韩国公共图书馆的经济影响力或价值的研究并不多，如果参考图书馆的整体价值，也只是部分参考。鉴于，必须进行仅关注图书馆经济价值的研究。在这方面，这项研究是相当有意义的。本研究开发的评价指标有可能成为可应用于公共图书馆以及其他类型图书馆的基本工具。此外，通过本研究制定的评价指标可以应用于图书馆等非营利组织，作为评价和展示图书馆经济价值的研究，可能会产生社会涟漪效应。据此，在本次研究中，我们对美国图书馆协会提出的榜单和国内研究成果进行了分析，并对核心细节进行了梳理，得出了初步的经济价值指数。最后，4个评价领域，