ABSTRACT Contrary to some assumptions, “race” and “class” share a common genealogy, as a longer view on the history of notions of “race” and “class” will demonstrate. Elaborating concepts of “class” and of “class struggle” was one of Marx’s projects between the years 1844 and 1848. He transcribes the tropes of French Restoration and English historiography, viz. those of racially based “conquest,” into the idea of “class struggle.” Like “the war of the races” before, Marx’s idea of the fundamental social antagonism varies according to whether it is located internal to, or at the outer limits of the State. There is a third possibility, a hybrid combining both positions, in the form of “two nations.” The idea of “two nations” that had a place in the historiography of conquest, comes to the fore again in anti-colonial struggles. Where it is not subsumed under dictates of “national unity,” this archipolitical historiography instates an anti-narrativist counter-history, calling out the original injustice – as opposed to a narrative history of the present.

中文翻译：

---

马克思如何“阶级”的到来–对“种族”-“阶级”的结合与脱节有更长远的了解

摘要与某些假设相反，“种族”和“阶级”具有共同的族谱，因为对“种族”和“阶级”概念的历史的更长远的观察将证明这一点。阐述“阶级”和“阶级斗争”的概念是马克思在1844年至1848年之间的项目之一。他记录了法国复兴和英国史学的主题。那些基于种族的“征服”的观念，变成了“阶级斗争”的观念。就像之前的“种族战争”一样，马克思关于基本社会对抗的思想因其位于国家内部还是外部而异。还有第三种可能性，即以“两个国家”的形式将两个职位结合在一起的混合体。在占领史上占有一席之地的“两个国家”的思想在反殖民斗争中再次崭露头角。