ABSTRACT In the wake of World War I, geographers helped advise national delegations at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference whose purpose was to delimit Europe’s new boundaries. The paper examines the role played by British geographers, specifically Alan Ogilvie and the British geographical delegation, in the Treaty of Trianon (1920) which greatly reduced Hungary’s territorial extent. Attention is paid to contemporary published work on the new Europe, particularly Marion Newbigin’s Aftermath: A Geographical Study of the Peace Terms and Ogilvie’s Boundary Settlement (1922). Assessment of manuscript diaries and correspondence reveals the complex circumstances faced by geographers engaged in peace work. The work of different practitioners – in the Royal Geographical Society (RGS), over how national boundaries should be arrived at (on either ethnic or physiographic grounds) – was hindered by inadequate map provision from British geographical institutions. This led Ogilvie to propose a new geographical body for Britain at a time when the RGS was facing criticism and when the meetings of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, not the RGS, provided the forum for discussion of the new post-war Europe.

中文翻译：

---

特里亚农及其后果：英国地理和匈牙利的“肢解”，c.1915-c.1922

摘要 在第一次世界大战之后，地理学家在 1919 年巴黎和会上为各国代表团提供建议，其目的是划定欧洲的新边界。这篇论文考察了英国地理学家，特别是艾伦奥吉尔维和英国地理代表团在大大缩小匈牙利领土范围的特里亚农条约（1920 年）中所扮演的角色。关注当代出版的关于新欧洲的作品，特别是 Marion Newbigin 的后果：和平条款和奥吉尔维边界定居点的地理研究 (1922)。对手稿日记和信件的评估揭示了从事和平工作的地理学家所面临的复杂情况。不同从业者的工作——在皇家地理学会 (RGS)，英国地理机构提供的地图不足阻碍了如何确定国界（基于种族或地理理由）。这促使 Ogilvie 在 RGS 面临批评以及英国科学促进会而不是 RGS 的会议为讨论新的战后欧洲提供论坛的时候为英国提议了一个新的地理机构.