ABSTRACT Science and technology studies (STS) scholars have long advocated a ‘participatory turn' in science, technology and innovation. Decisively informed by STS, participatory experiments across the world have sought to overcome the limitations of technocratic approaches and traditional innovation processes, to allow for new forms of democratic engagement. Yet the interplay between modes of participatory experiments and their wider political-economic ordering is significantly evolving. Alongside traditional deliberative experiments of the so-called ‘participatory turn,' participation is now also organized in various collective experiments during which technologies are tested, e.g. in ‘living-labs' or ‘hackathons.’ Currently, participatory experiments are shaped by a double trend of accelerating time and intensifying value; they are now often organized as intense events seeking to extract as much value as possible from participants. This trend indicates a broader shift in the way participatory experiments are imagined, designed and implemented, away from participation in decision-making to participation in innovation-making, as well as a shift from civic values to productivist values with the pervasive expectation that publics should increasingly act as innovators and entrepreneurs. The relative abandonment of democratization warrants STS co-productionist analyses that question the values and objectives of participatory experiments in addition to their formats, issues, and publics.

中文翻译：

---

在参与式转弯方面表现出色？加快参与实验的时间并提高价值

摘要科学技术研究（STS）学者长期以来一直主张科学，技术和创新的“参与性转向”。在STS的决定性决定下，世界各地的参与性试验试图克服技术官僚主义方法和传统创新过程的局限性，以允许新形式的民主参与。然而，参与性实验模式与其更广泛的政治经济秩序之间的相互作用正在显着发展。除了所谓的“参与式转弯”的传统协商实验外，现在还以各种集体实验的形式组织了参与，在此过程中对技术进行了测试，例如在“生活实验室”或“黑客马拉松”中。当前，参与性实验是由加速时间和增加价值的双重趋势形成的。现在，他们经常被组织成激烈的活动，以寻求从参与者那里获得尽可能多的价值。这种趋势表明，参与性思考的设计，实施方式已发生了广泛的转变，从参与决策转变为参与创新，以及人们普遍期望公众应该从公民价值观向生产主义价值观转变。越来越多地充当创新者和企业家。相对民主的放弃使STS联合制片人的分析质疑了参与式实验的价值和目标，以及形式，问题和公众。设计和实施，从参与决策到参与创新，以及从公民价值观念向生产价值观念的转变，人们普遍期望公众应越来越多地充当创新者和企业家。相对民主的放弃使STS联合制片人的分析质疑参与式实验的价值和目标，以及形式，问题和公众。设计和实施，从参与决策到参与创新，以及从公民价值观念向生产价值观念的转变，人们普遍期望公众应越来越多地充当创新者和企业家。相对民主的放弃使STS联合制片人的分析质疑了参与式实验的价值和目标，以及形式，问题和公众。