当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Policy Studies
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Symposium: revisiting the three pillars of Deliberative Policy Analysis
Policy Studies ( IF 2.152 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-05 , DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2020.1774147 Selen A. Ercan 1 , Anna Durnová 2, 3 , Anne Loeber 1, 4 , Hendrik Wagenaar 1, 3, 5
Policy Studies ( IF 2.152 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-05 , DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2020.1774147 Selen A. Ercan 1 , Anna Durnová 2, 3 , Anne Loeber 1, 4 , Hendrik Wagenaar 1, 3, 5
Affiliation
ABSTRACT This mini-symposium revisits the three pillars of Deliberative Policy Analysis (DPA): deliberation, interpretation and practice. DPA was originally intended as a moral-analytical programme that integrated these pillars, but policy analysts working in this tradition seem to have mainly been guided by one specific pillar, interpretation We believe this has not only confounded the nature and potential of DPA but has also limited the knowledge and impact of policy studies. The goal of this mini-symposium is to facilitate a dialogue between representatives of the three pillars and the authors of DPA on how interpretation, practice, and deliberation could be integrated. It originates from a roundtable discussion organized at the ECPR General Conference 2018 in Hamburg. Each representative discusses the nature and development of their pillar and reflects on its value for DPA, followed by an author reflection on the past and future course of DPA. First, Selen Ercan explores the deliberative pillar. Second, Anna Durnová delves into the interpretive pillar. Third, Anne Loeber examines the practice pillar. Finally, Hendrik Wagenaar offers his author reflections. Taken together, this mini-symposium frames the focus and aims of this special issue and sets a course for the future development of DPA.
中文翻译:
研讨会:重新审视协商政策分析的三大支柱
摘要 本次小型研讨会重新审视了审议政策分析 (DPA) 的三大支柱:审议、解释和实践。DPA 最初旨在作为整合这些支柱的道德分析计划,但在这一传统中工作的政策分析师似乎主要受一个特定支柱的指导,解释我们认为这不仅混淆了 DPA 的性质和潜力,而且限制了政策研究的知识和影响。本次小型研讨会的目标是促进三大支柱的代表与 DPA 的作者之间就如何整合解释、实践和审议进行对话。它起源于 2018 年在汉堡举行的 ECPR 大会上组织的圆桌讨论。每位代表讨论其支柱的性质和发展,并反思其对 DPA 的价值,然后作者反思 DPA 的过去和未来进程。首先,Selen Ercan 探讨了审议支柱。其次,安娜·杜诺娃 (Anna Durnová) 深入研究了解释支柱。第三,Anne Loeber 检查了实践支柱。最后,亨德里克·瓦格纳尔 (Hendrik Wagenaar) 提供了他的作者感想。综上所述,本次小型研讨会确定了本期特刊的重点和目标,并为 DPA 的未来发展指明了方向。
更新日期:2020-06-05
中文翻译:
研讨会:重新审视协商政策分析的三大支柱
摘要 本次小型研讨会重新审视了审议政策分析 (DPA) 的三大支柱:审议、解释和实践。DPA 最初旨在作为整合这些支柱的道德分析计划,但在这一传统中工作的政策分析师似乎主要受一个特定支柱的指导,解释我们认为这不仅混淆了 DPA 的性质和潜力,而且限制了政策研究的知识和影响。本次小型研讨会的目标是促进三大支柱的代表与 DPA 的作者之间就如何整合解释、实践和审议进行对话。它起源于 2018 年在汉堡举行的 ECPR 大会上组织的圆桌讨论。每位代表讨论其支柱的性质和发展,并反思其对 DPA 的价值,然后作者反思 DPA 的过去和未来进程。首先,Selen Ercan 探讨了审议支柱。其次,安娜·杜诺娃 (Anna Durnová) 深入研究了解释支柱。第三,Anne Loeber 检查了实践支柱。最后,亨德里克·瓦格纳尔 (Hendrik Wagenaar) 提供了他的作者感想。综上所述,本次小型研讨会确定了本期特刊的重点和目标,并为 DPA 的未来发展指明了方向。