ABSTRACT We build on Morgan’s deep conventionalist base by offering a pragmatic approach (‘transitionalism’) for achieving normative progress on sports most intractable problems (e.g. performance enhancement restrictions, collision sport dangers, competitive classification discord). Our account picks up where Morgan suggests disparate normative communities ‘default’ to inferior yet functionally ‘pragmatic’ resolutions to conflict. Pragmatic resolutions, we contend, offer normative substance by providing the means to move beyond intellectual stalemates by re-orientating our normative efforts relative to the three cornerstones of Morgan’s deep conventionalism: the nature and status of different sporting conventions; the difference between conflicts of an ‘intramural’ and ‘extramural’ kind; and what constitutes a resolution to sporting disagreements.

中文翻译：

---

面对棘手的困境，务实的传统主义和体育规范性

摘要我们通过提供务实的方法（“过渡主义”）在摩根的深厚传统主义基础上建立基础，以便在最棘手的问题（例如性能增强限制，碰撞运动危险，竞争性分类失调）上实现规范进步。在摩根建议不同的规范性社区“默认”劣质但在功能上“实用”的冲突解决方案的地方，我们的叙述越来越多。我们认为，务实决议通过提供一种手段来提供规范性内容，即通过相对于摩根深厚的传统主义的三个基石：不同体育公约的性质和地位；重新调整我们的规范性工作，提供超越理性僵局的手段。“内部”和“外部”类型的冲突之间的区别；以及解决运动分歧的方法。