当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Transportation Safety & Security › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A comparison of the relationship between individual values and aggressive driving in five countries
Journal of Transportation Safety & Security ( IF 2.825 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-03 , DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2020.1784341
Gizem Fındık 1 , Bilgesu Kaçan 1, 2 , Gaye Solmazer 1, 3 , Özlem Ersan 1 , Yeşim Üzümcüoğlu Zihni 1, 4 , Derya Azık 1 , Türker Özkan 1 , Timo Lajunen 5 , Bahar Öz 1 , Anton Pashkevich 6 , Maria Pashkevich 6 , Vassiliki Danelli-Mylona 7 , Dimitra Georgogianni 7 , Ema Berisha Krasniqi 8 , Muhamed Krasniqi 8 , Evangelos Makris 7 , Ksenia Shubenkova 9 , Gentianë Xheladini 8
Affiliation  

Abstract

Values are supposed to transcend specific situations and contexts. A country-independent relationship is expected between individual values and aggressive driving. The purpose of this novel study was to investigate the relationship between individual values and aggressive driving. The data were collected from five countries, namely, Estonia, Greece, Kosovo, Russia, and Turkey. The number of participants was 124 in Estonian, 272 in Greek, 107 in Kosovar, 132 in Russian, and 87 in Turkish samples. Participants filled out a demographic information form, Driver Anger Indicators Scale, and Short-Schwartz’s Value Survey. Results of hierarchical regression analyses showed that values are related to aggressive driving (i.e., aggressive warnings, hostile aggression and revenge) of self and not to perceived aggressive behaviours of others. Value types were not related to aggressive driving, whereas higher-order values were. Conservation was negatively associated with aggressive warnings of self in the Greek sample, and self-transcendence was negatively associated with hostile aggression and revenge of self in Turkish as well as Greek samples. Social focus was negatively and personal focus was positively associated with both types of aggressive driving in the Greek sample. Social focus was also negatively associated with hostile aggression and revenge in the Russian sample. Growth anxiety-free was negatively associated with hostile aggression and revenge of self in Russian and Turkish samples. The relationships between values and aggressive driving (of self) were not country-independent for the five countries, even though the lack of significant relationships between values and aggressive driving (of others) were country-independent.



中文翻译:

五个国家个人价值观与激进驾驶关系的比较

摘要

价值观应该超越特定的情况和背景。预计个人价值观和激进驾驶之间存在独立于国家/地区的关系。这项新颖研究的目的是调查个人价值观与激进驾驶之间的关系。数据来自五个国家,即爱沙尼亚、希腊、科索沃、俄罗斯和土耳其。参与者人数为爱沙尼亚语 124 人,希腊语 272 人,科索沃语 107 人,俄语 132 人,土耳其语样本 87 人。参与者填写了人口统计信息表、驾驶员愤怒指标量表和 Short-Schwartz 的价值调查。分层回归分析的结果表明,价值观与自我的攻击性驾驶(即攻击性警告、敌对攻击和报复)有关,与感知到的他人攻击性行为无关。价值类型与激进驾驶无关,而高阶价值则与之相关。在希腊样本中,保守与对自我的攻击性警告呈负相关,在土耳其和希腊样本中,自我超越与敌对侵略和自我报复呈负相关。在希腊样本中,社会焦点是负面的,个人焦点与两种类型的攻击性驾驶正相关。在俄罗斯样本中,社会焦点也与敌对侵略和报复呈负相关。在俄罗斯和土耳其样本中,无生长焦虑与敌对攻击和自我报复呈负相关。这五个国家的价值观和激进驾驶(自我)之间的关系不是独立于国家的,

更新日期:2020-07-03
down
wechat
bug