ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on a case of the gradual corporatisation of temporary interventions in San Francisco, California. Here, the creation of ad hoc programmes for proposing, advancing and maintaining provisional public spaces in the city has challenged the essence of previously recognised bottom-up practices, contributing to hidden forms of spatial and social exclusion. The analysis of this case is an opportunity for critical reflection on the controversies and contradictions generated by the upscaling of what started as a way to claim rights over spaces and to raise the possibility of non-traditional forms of producing and maintaining the public space.

摘要

本文关注的是加利福尼亚州旧金山市临时干预逐步公司化的案例。在这里，用于提议，推进和维护城市临时公共空间的临时计划的创建已经挑战了以前公认的自下而上的实践的本质，为隐藏形式的空间和社会排斥做出了贡献。对这一案例的分析为反思争议和矛盾提供了机会，这些争议和矛盾是由扩大主张空间的权利而引发的，而这种主张是为了主张对空间的权利，并增加了非传统形式的生产和维护公共空间的可能性。