The so-called new kinship studies, inspired by David Schneider, are shown to be mistaken in arguing that non-Western kinship notions are not grounded in native appreciations of procreation. The argument is sustainable mostly by an almost complete neglect of the pertinent kinship terminologies. Attention to such terminologies, by contrast, shows that close procreative kin, even when superficially classed with others, including non-kin, are in fact subclassed as the semantically central members of their respective classes. It is further shown that evidence for this argument has been in the ethnographic literature for more than a century and has by now reached a point where it is nothing short of overwhelming.

中文翻译：

---

走向后施奈德的亲属关系视角

受大卫施耐德启发的所谓新亲属关系研究被证明是错误的，即认为非西方亲属关系概念并非基于本土对生育的欣赏。由于几乎完全忽略了相关的亲属关系术语，这一论点主要是可持续的。相比之下，对这些术语的关注表明，近亲，即使在表面上与其他亲属（包括非亲属）归类时，实际上也被细分为各自类别的语义中心成员。进一步表明，这个论点的证据已经在民族志文献中存在了一个多世纪，现在已经达到了压倒性的地步。