当前位置: X-MOL 学术Conservation and Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Silos Of Natural Resource Governance: Implications Of Sector-Led Coastal Management At The Village Level In Kenya And Zanzibar-Tanzania
Conservation and Society ( IF 2.492 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-01 , DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_18_116
Fiona Nunan , MarlynA Omondi , AzizaY Nchimbi , MwitaM Mangora , JamesG Kairo , MwanahijaS Shalli , NarrimanS Jiddawi

Taking a coordinated, holistic approach to the governance of coastal ecosystems is widely advocated in recognition of the need to manage ecosystems as a whole. Despite commitment to approaches such as integrated coastal zone management and ecosystem-based management of fisheries, governance remains fragmented, with sectors such as environment, fisheries and forestry maintaining separate systems of governance from the national to village level. These systems include the formation of separate community-based structures, reporting directly to the respective sectoral ministry. This raises questions about how this collaborative governance approach aligns with taking a more integrated, holistic approach to management. The paper draws on findings from research in Kenya and Zanzibar-Tanzania in coastal villages where forest and fisheries management groups have been formed. The research found that the groups operate in compartmentalised ‘silos', in contrast to the interrelated ecosystems on which they depend, with little coordination of plans and priorities. In addition, these groups are not consistent in their relationship to local government, answering directly to the sectoral ministry rather than democratic local government, raising issues for accountability and sustainability. These dual challenges of a sectoral-focus and long-term sustainability must be addressed for management of ecosystems to be integrated and effective.

中文翻译:

自然资源治理的孤岛:在肯尼亚和桑给巴尔-坦桑尼亚的村庄一级,由部门领导的沿海管理的含义

人们普遍认为,对沿海生态系统的治理采取协调,整体的方法,以认识到需要整体管理生态系统。尽管承诺采取诸如沿海地区综合管理和基于生态系统的渔业管理之类的方法,但治理仍是零散的,环境,渔业和林业等部门保持着从国家到乡村的单独治理体系。这些系统包括形成单独的基于社区的结构,直接向相应部门的部门报告。这引发了有关这种协作治理方法与如何采用更集成,整体的管理方法相一致的疑问。本文借鉴了肯尼亚和桑给巴尔坦桑尼亚在沿海村庄的研究结果,沿海村庄已形成了森林和渔业管理小组。研究发现,与他们赖以生存的相互关联的生态系统相反,这些组织在隔离的“孤岛”中运作,而计划和优先事项的协调却很少。此外,这些团体与地方政府的关系不一致,直接向部门部门而不是民主的地方政府作出回应,从而引发了问责制和可持续性问题。为了使生态系统的管理变得一体化和有效,必须解决以部门为重点和长期可持续性的双重挑战。与它们所依赖的相互联系的生态系统形成对比,几乎没有计划和优先事项的协调。此外,这些团体与地方政府的关系不一致,直接向部门部门而不是民主的地方政府作出回应,从而引发了问责制和可持续性问题。为了使生态系统的管理变得一体化和有效,必须解决以部门为重点和长期可持续性的双重挑战。与它们所依赖的相互联系的生态系统形成对比,几乎没有计划和优先事项的协调。此外,这些团体与地方政府的关系不一致,直接向部门部门而不是民主的地方政府作出回应,从而引发了问责制和可持续性问题。为了使生态系统的管理变得一体化和有效,必须解决以部门为重点和长期可持续性的双重挑战。
更新日期:2020-01-01
down
wechat
bug