Gender justice and equality have risen to prominence in the constitution of foreign and security policy. This article locates the analysis of feminist foreign policy (FFP) within the wider context of Sweden's state feminist tradition as well as its pursuit of “gender cosmopolitanism” in global politics. Both “gender cosmopolitanism” and Sweden's state feminist tradition provided fertile ground for the formal adoption of FFP in 2014. The article employs poststructural discursive techniques that enable the identification of the statist feminist and cosmopolitan foundations of feminist foreign policy. More specifically, the article provides a discursive analysis of the ethical and feminist ambitions, normative contents, and pitfalls of FFP. Though FFP is grounded in other-regarding cosmopolitan care for vulnerable women and girls beyond borders, it exhibits a range of pitfalls and inconsistencies, such as equating gender with women and, at times, privileging results-oriented strategies over thoroughgoing gender analysis of structural injustices such as gendered violence. The article ends with a discussion of Sweden's attempts to translate the feminist and cosmopolitan contents of FFP commitments into policy practice, with a focus on the eradication of gender-based violence. (Less)

中文翻译：

---

瑞典女权主义外交政策和“性别世界主义”

性别公正和平等在外交和安全政策的宪法中变得突出。本文在瑞典国家女权主义传统及其在全球政治中追求“性别世界主义”的更广泛背景下对女权主义外交政策（FFP）进行了分析。“性别世界主义”和瑞典的国家女权主义传统为 2014 年正式采用 FFP 提供了肥沃的土壤。本文采用后结构话语技术，能够识别女权主义外交政策的国家主义女权主义和世界主义基础。更具体地说，本文对 FFP 的伦理和女权主义抱负、规范内容和陷阱进行了话语分析。尽管 FFP 的基础是在其他方面对弱势妇女和女孩的跨国关怀，但它表现出一系列陷阱和不一致之处，例如将性别与女性等同，有时将注重结果的战略置于对结构性不公正的彻底性别分析之上比如性别暴力。文章最后讨论了瑞典试图将 FFP 承诺的女权主义和世界主义内容转化为政策实践，重点是消除基于性别的暴力。（较少的）试图将 FFP 承诺的女权主义和世界主义内容转化为政策实践，重点是消除基于性别的暴力。（较少的）试图将 FFP 承诺的女权主义和世界主义内容转化为政策实践，重点是消除基于性别的暴力。（较少的）