当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ethics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Just and Unjust Proliferation
Ethics ( IF 10.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-01 , DOI: 10.1086/707213
Gary J. Bass

Political theorists had vigorous debates about nuclear weapons in the 1980s but have been largely silent about them recently. This article seeks to reopen those discussions. It evaluates the main justifications for nuclear proliferation since 1945: arguments from consistency, nationalism, democratic legitimacy, self-defense, peaceful effects, and supreme emergency. Most of these arguments are badly flawed, as are the arguments for retaining the nuclear arsenals of many of the established nuclear powers. Instead, this article proposes a first cut at a stringent standard for judging the acquisition of strategic nuclear weapons, drawing on jus ad bellum and jus in bello principles.

中文翻译:

公正和不公正的扩散

政治理论家在 1980 年代就核武器进行了激烈的辩论,但最近对它们基本上保持沉默。本文试图重新开始这些讨论。它评估了自 1945 年以来核扩散的主要理由:一致性、民族主义、民主合法性、自卫、和平效果和最高紧急情况的论据。大多数这些论点都存在严重缺陷,保留许多已建立核大国的核武库的论点也是如此。相反,本文提出了以严格的标准进行首次削减,以判断是否获得战略核武器,并借鉴了战争法和战时法原则。
更新日期:2020-04-01
down
wechat
bug