Drawing upon the theoretical debate on the concept of common good involving, in particular, Sison and Fontrodona (2012), I aim to show how the common good principle can serve as the basis for a new diversity perspective. Each of the three dominant diversity approaches—equality, diversity management, and inclusion—runs the ethical risk of focusing on community or individual levels, or on particular disciplines—economic, social, or moral. This article demonstrates that the common good principle could mitigate the ethical risks inherent to each of these diversity approaches. There are three positive aspects to a comprehensive common good perspective: 1) it includes considering different community levels, which it connects by subsidiarity, 2) it embraces the moral, social, and economic fields, which it connects by teleological hierarchy, and 3) it avoids the risk of exclusion by generating a sense of solidarity.

中文翻译：

---

关于多样性的共同利益

利用特别涉及 Sison 和 Fontrodona (2012) 的关于共同利益概念的理论辩论，我旨在展示共同利益原则如何可以作为新的多样性观点的基础。三种主要的多样性方法——平等、多样性管理和包容——都面临着关注社区或个人层面，或特定学科——经济、社会或道德的伦理风险。本文表明，共同利益原则可以减轻每种多样性方法固有的道德风险。一个全面的共同利益视角有三个积极的方面：1）它包括考虑不同的社区层次，它通过辅助性连接，2）它包含道德、社会和经济领域，它通过目的论等级连接，