This paper aims to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of contributors to Spanish academic journals regarding open access, open peer review, and altmetrics. It also explores how age, gender, professional experience, career history, and perception and use of social media influence authors opinions toward these developments in scholarly publishing. A sample of contributors (n-1254) to Spanish academic journals was invited to participate in a survey about the aforementioned topics. The response rate was 24 per cent (n-295). Contributors to Spanish scholarly journals hold a favourable opinion of open access but were more cautious about open peer review and altmetrics. Younger and female scholars were more reluctant to accept open peer review practices. A positive attitude toward social networks did not necessarily translate into enthusiasm for emerging trends in scholarly publishing. Despite this, ResearchGate users were more aware of altmetrics.

中文翻译：

---

西班牙学术期刊撰稿人对开放获取，开放同行评审和高度度量的态度

本文旨在更好地理解西班牙学术期刊的撰稿人关于开放获取，开放同行评审和高度度量的观点。它还探讨了年龄，性别，专业经验，职业经历以及社交媒体的认知和使用如何影响作者对学术出版中这些发展的看法。邀请了西班牙学术期刊的贡献者样本（n-1254）参加有关上述主题的调查。答复率为24％（n-295）。西班牙学术期刊的投稿人对开放获取持赞成态度，但对开放同行评审和测度指标持谨慎态度。年轻和女性学者更不愿接受开放式同行评审的做法。对社交网络的积极态度并不一定会转化为对学术出版新兴趋势的热情。尽管如此，ResearchGate用户还是更了解海拔高度。