当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Eosinopenia <100/μL as a marker of active COVID-19: An observational prospective study
Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection ( IF 7.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-08 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.12.005
Roderau Outh , Caroline Boutin , Philippe Gueudet , Marcelino Suzuki , Matthieu Saada , Hugues Aumaître

Objectives

To analyse the diagnostic performance of eosinopenia, alone or combined with polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and/or lymphocytes, as a marker of active COVID-19 in patients hospitalized for suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

A prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for suspicion of COVID-19 in a COVID unit was performed from 20th March to 5th April 2020, in Perpignan, France. Patients for which there was a doubt upon diagnosis, who were recently under oral corticosteroids, had myeloid malignancy or human immunodeficient virus infection were excluded. SARS-CoV-2 detection was performed using an RT-PCR assay, from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Complete blood count were performed for all patients.

Results

One-hundred and twenty-one patient were included: 57 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 64 patients were not. Eosinophil count was lower in the COVID-19 group (median: 0/μL versus 70/μL, p < 0.0001). To diagnose COVID-19, eosinopenia had a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 78.1% while lymphopenia's were 73.7% and 62.5% respectively. Using area under curve (AUC) of receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves, eosinophil's optimal cut-off level was 10/μL, sensitivity and specificity were 86%, and 79.7% respectively. Regarding the eosinophil/PMN ratio, the optimal cut-off level was 3.344, sensitivity and specificity were 87.7% and 73.4% respectively. The AUC of lymphocyte/PMN ratio was significantly lower than eosinophil/PMN ratio's (0.621 versus 0.846, p = 0.0003).

Conclusion

Eosinopenia – <10/μL – and eosinophil/PMN ratio are useful, low-cost, reproducible tools to help diagnose COVID-19, during an epidemic period, in a population of hospitalized patients admitted for suspicion of COVID-19.



中文翻译:

嗜酸性粒细胞减少<100 /μL作为活性COVID-19的标志物:一项观察性前瞻性研究

目标

为了分析因怀疑SARS-CoV-2住院的患者,嗜酸性粒细胞减少症(单独或与多形核中性粒细胞(PMN)和/或淋巴细胞联合)作为活性COVID-19的标志物的诊断性能。

方法

一项前瞻性观察性研究于2020年3月20日至4月5日在法国佩皮尼昂进行了研究,其中包括因怀疑COVID-19而住院的患者。排除了对诊断有疑问的患者,这些患者最近接受口服皮质类固醇激素治疗,患有髓样恶性肿瘤或人类免疫缺陷病毒感染。使用RT-PCR分析从鼻咽拭子样本中进行SARS-CoV-2检测。对所有患者进行全血细胞计数。

结果

包括一百二十一例患者:57例被诊断为COVID-19的患者,64例未被诊断为COVID-19的患者。COVID-19组的嗜酸性粒细胞计数较低(中位数:0 /μL与70 /μL,p <0.0001)。为了诊断COVID-19,曙红减少症的敏感性为89.5%,特异性为78.1%,而淋巴细胞减少症的敏感性分别为73.7%和62.5%。使用接收工作特征(ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(AUC),嗜酸性粒细胞的最佳截断水平为10 /μL,敏感性和特异性分别为86%和79.7%。关于嗜酸性粒细胞/ PMN比率,最佳临界水平为3.344,敏感性和特异性分别为87.7%和73.4%。淋巴细胞/ PMN比值的AUC显着低于嗜酸性粒细胞/ PMN比值(0.621对0.846,p = 0.0003)。

结论

嗜酸细胞减少症(<10 /μL)和嗜酸性粒细胞/ PMN比率是有用的,低成本的,可重现的工具,可在流行期间对因怀疑是COVID-19而住院的患者人群进行诊断,以帮助诊断COVID-19。

更新日期:2021-02-19
down
wechat
bug