There is increasing expectation that research be communicated broadly to share knowledge across industry, professional, governmental, and public spheres. Scholarly publishers can benefit from the sharing of research beyond academia since the potential for societal impact encourages further support from both industry and governmental funders. This paper draws on qualitative in-depth interview data from Australian- and Japanese-based early career researchers (ECRs) to investigate how higher education institutions support the development of diverse communication skills needed by ECRs to effectively share their research both in academia and beyond. We found that sharing research for academic and other diverse audiences is often perceived as valued but may not always be supported. Output valuing was communicated in performance management, but there were compelling differences between the two nations, with Japanese-based ECRs reporting a stronger expectation of research outputs for non-academic audiences than their Australian counterparts. There were also indications that institutional support for both academic and translational outputs may change in response to nations' shifting research priorities.

中文翻译：

---

日本和澳大利亚对学术和转化成果的机构评价和支持的观点

人们越来越期望广泛交流研究，以在行业、专业、政府和公共领域共享知识。学术出版商可以从学术界以外的研究共享中受益，因为社会影响的潜力鼓励了行业和政府资助者的进一步支持。本文利用来自澳大利亚和日本的早期职业研究人员 (ECR) 的定性深度访谈数据来调查高等教育机构如何支持 ECR 所需的各种沟通技巧的发展，以便在学术界和其他领域有效地分享他们的研究。我们发现，为学术界和其他不同受众分享研究成果通常被认为是有价值的，但可能并不总是得到支持。在绩效管理中传达了产出价值，但两国之间存在显着差异，与澳大利亚同行相比，日本的 ECR 报告对非学术受众的研究成果有更高的期望。还有迹象表明，对学术和转化产出的机构支持可能会随着各国研究重点的变化而发生变化。