Using a mixed-methods design, the present study examined intimate partner surveillance among a diverse sample of intimate partner abuse (IPA) survivors (n = 246), including women of Mexican (n = 83), Korean (n = 50), Vietnamese (n = 49), and European descent (n = 64). Most survivors (57%) described surveillance in either survey or interview; inductive thematic analysis revealed seven forms of surveillance. Finally, two-step cluster analysis identified two patterns of victimization most clearly differentiated by surveillance, but ethnic group differences in rates and patterns of abuse did not emerge. Implications for both clinicians and researchers are discussed.

本研究采用混合方法设计，检查了亲密伴侣虐待 (IPA) 幸存者 ( n = 246) 的不同样本中的亲密伴侣监测，包括墨西哥女性 ( n = 83)、韩国女性 ( n = 50)、越南女性( n = 49) 和欧洲血统 ( n = 64)。大多数幸存者（57%）在调查或访谈中描述了监测；归纳主题分析揭示了七种形式的监视。最后，两步聚类分析确定了两种受监视最明显区分的受害模式，但并未出现种族群体在虐待率和虐待模式方面的差异。讨论了对临床医生和研究人员的影响。