Psychology & Health ( IF 3.358 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-07 Oliver Friedrich, Evelyn Kunschitz, Lisa Pongratz, Sophia Wieländer, Christine Schöppl, Johann Sipötz
Abstract
Objective
To examine patient-reported causal attributions in patients with coronary artery disease and classify them according to attribution theory.
Design
Patients with angiographically verified coronary artery disease (n = 459) were asked to report causal attributions by answering the respective open-ended item of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire.
Main Outcome Measures
Groups resulting from classifications were characterised with regard to sociodemographic and clinical variables, Quality of Life (SF-12), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and illness perception (BIPQ).
Results
Stress emerged as the single most important attribution followed by various behavioural factors and genetic predisposition. There was a remarkable mismatch between the presence of modifiable risk factors (smoking, obesity) and patient-reported illness attributions. Based on the results of the descriptive categorisation of illness attributions we developed a transparent, easily reproducible scheme for dimensional classification of the fifteen most common responses according to attribution theory. The classification resulted in four groups: Behaviour/Emotional State, Past Behaviour/Emotional State, Physical/Psychological Trait and External.
Conclusion
We found a pattern of illness attributions largely in line with previous trials. The dimensional classification resulted in four groups and highlighted potential entry points for physician-patient communication aimed at establishing beneficial disease self-management.
中文翻译:
冠心病患者的疾病归因分类
摘要
目的
要检查患者报告的冠心病患者的因果归因,并根据归因理论对其进行分类。
设计
经血管造影证实为冠状动脉疾病的患者(n = 459)被要求通过回答《简短疾病知觉调查表》的各个开放式项目来报告因果关系。
主要观察指标
根据社会人口统计学和临床变量,生活质量(SF-12),抑郁症(PHQ-9),焦虑症(GAD-7)和疾病知觉(BIPQ)对来自分类的组进行特征化。
结果
压力是最重要的归因,其次是各种行为因素和遗传易感性。可改变的危险因素(吸烟,肥胖)与患者报告的疾病归因之间存在显着的不匹配。基于疾病归因的描述性分类的结果,我们根据归因理论为15种最常见的应对措施的尺寸分类开发了一种透明,易于再现的方案。分类分为四组:行为/情绪状态,过去行为/情绪状态,身体/心理特征和外在因素。
结论
我们发现疾病归因的模式与先前的试验基本一致。维度分类分为四组,并突出了旨在建立有益的疾病自我管理的医患交流的潜在切入点。