Peer review remains problematic, but only partial resolutions to the problems have been identified. The article processing charge financial model looks like a farmer who works hard to produce food but then must pay to sell his final products to consumers. Article categories are largely meaningless – ‘original articles’ are not the only original content, and how rapid are rapid communications? Word limits belong to the print environment and are overly proscriptive in the digital environment. Why is only one author identified as the corresponding author when all authors should take responsibility for their articles?

中文翻译：

---

改革科学出版

同行评审仍然存在问题，但只确定了部分问题的解决方案。文章加工费财务模型看起来像一个农民努力生产食物，但必须付费才能将最终产品出售给消费者。文章类别基本上没有意义——“原创文章”不是唯一的原创内容，快速传播的速度有多快？字数限制属于印刷环境，在数字环境中过于严格。当所有作者都应对其文章负责时，为什么只有一位作者被确定为通讯作者？