当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Journal of the Commons › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
An empirico-legal analytical & design model for local smart energy systems: Applying the ‘ILTIAD’ model, combining the IAD-Framework with Institutional Legal Theory
International Journal of the Commons ( IF 2.646 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-07 , DOI: 10.18352/ijc.885
Michiel A. Heldeweg , Imke Lammers

This article presents a new framework for analysis and design of legal-governance settings for collective action challenges, particularly of local (smart) microgrids, with a focus on related local planning. The framework connects Ostrom’s IAD-Framework with Institutional Legal Theory (ILT), to foster proper understanding of both empirical and legal-prescriptive elements. This is relevant to state of affairs analyses, but also to design-oriented analysis towards institutional change of legal settings for local smart systems. The proposed framework connection (named ‘ILTIAD’) contributes to a proper empirico-legal understanding of existing and possible improvements in public-private arrangements relevant to bring about innovations of the said local microgrids. A three-step conceptual approach is presented. The first step is about relating local smart microgrids to the concept of a collective action and explaining the relevance of adding an ILT perspective to the IAD-framework. The second step is to frame the connection between IAD and ILT (as ILTIAD) with a view on relevant action situations. To this end, Ostrom’s ‘rules-in-use’ are connected to legal ‘rules-in-form’. This institutional rule-perspective is then aligned with action situations at Ostrom’s four analytical levels, considering that different legal institutions are relevant to the content of action situation rules. In the third step, the institutional rule-perspective is placed in the specific legal setting of an example for a Dutch Crown Decree on experiments for decentralized renewable energy projects. We demonstrate how the abstract ILTIAD-framework provides a lens to identify legal aspects as constraints and opportunities within action situations. Furthermore, we show from a design perspective how the framework can help identify gaps and conflicts when establishing and maintaining particular local smart microgrids. In doing so we also connect to dynamic aspects of underlying transition justice concerns, following energy expansion versus energy democratization frames. In conclusion the article reflects inter alia on some analytical and methodological aspects of ILTIAD as compared to the IAD-framework.

中文翻译:

本地智能能源系统的经验法律分析和设计模型:应用“ ILTIAD”模型,将IAD框架与制度法律理论相结合

本文提供了一个新的框架,用于分析和设计针对集体行动挑战(尤其是本地(智能)微电网)的法律治理环境,并着重于相关的本地规划。该框架将Ostrom的IAD框架与机构法律理论(ILT)联系起来,以促进对经验和法律规定要素的正确理解。这不仅与状态分析相关,而且与针对本地智能系统法律设置的制度变更的面向设计的分析有关。拟议的框架连接(命名为“ ILTIAD”)有助于对经验和法律方面的正确理解,以对与实现上述本地微电网的创新有关的公私安排的现有和可能的改进做出正确的理解。提出了一个三步骤的概念方法。第一步是将本地智能微电网与集体行动的概念联系起来,并说明向IAD框架添加ILT观点的相关性。第二步是从相关行动情况的角度来构建IAD与ILT(如ILTIAD)之间的联系。为此,奥斯特罗姆(Ostrom)的“使用规则”与合法的“形式规则”相关。然后,考虑到不同的法律制度与行动状况规则的内容相关,这种制度规则的观点将与奥斯特罗姆的四个分析层面的行动状况保持一致。第三步,将制度性规则置于特定的法律环境中,以荷兰皇家法令为例,对分散式可再生能源项目进行实验。我们演示了抽象的ILTIAD框架如何提供一个镜头,将法律方面确定为行动情况下的制约因素和机遇。此外,我们从设计角度展示了在建立和维护特定的本地智能微电网时,该框架如何帮助识别差距和冲突。在此过程中,我们还将关注能源扩张与能源民主化框架之间潜在的过渡司法关注的动态方面。总之,与IAD框架相比,本文尤其反映了ILTIAD的一些分析和方法论方面。在此过程中,我们还将关注能源扩张与能源民主化框架之间潜在的过渡司法关注的动态方面。总之,与IAD框架相比,本文尤其反映了ILTIAD的一些分析和方法论方面。在此过程中,我们还将关注能源扩张与能源民主化框架之间潜在的过渡司法关注的动态方面。总之,与IAD框架相比,本文尤其反映了ILTIAD的一些分析和方法论方面。
更新日期:2019-05-07
down
wechat
bug