Global norm-setting to advance women's rights has historically been a fertile area for feminist activism. These efforts in multilateral institutions have also, however, attracted a transnationally coordinated backlash. Initially spearheaded by the Vatican, the right-wing backlash has consolidated into a curious coalition that now includes authoritarian and right-wing populist regimes and bridges significant differences of religious belief, regime type, and ideology. Hostility to feminism has proven to be a valuable point of connection between interests that otherwise have little in common. Some tensions between feminist groups have been exploited by right-wing interests, in particular over sex workers' rights and the use of technology to alter the interpretation and experience of sexuality, reproduction, and gender (transgender issues, surrogacy, sex-selective abortion, and sexuality and disability). This essay reviews a recent instance of right-wing coordination, seen in the nearly successful effort to derail the 2019 meeting of the UN Commission on the Status of Women. It examines the strategic responses of transnational feminist movements to this backlash in multilateral institutions, including their exploration of new transnational policy issues and experimentation with hybrid transnational spaces.

中文翻译：

---

多边准则制定的新竞争：跨国女权主义者和非法反弹

从历史上看，制定全球规范以促进妇女权利一直是女权主义行动的沃土。但是，在多边机构中的这些努力也引起了跨国协调的强烈反对。最初由梵蒂冈带头的右翼反冲力量已合并为一个好奇的联盟，现在包括威权主义和右翼民粹主义政权，并弥合了宗教信仰，政权类型和意识形态的重大差异。事实证明，对女权主义的敌视是利益之间重要的联系点，而这些利益本来就没有什么共同点。女权主义者之间的一些紧张关系被右翼利益所利用，特别是在性工作者的权利和利用技术改变性，生殖和性别（跨性别问题，代孕，选择性流产以及性与残疾）。本文回顾了右翼协调的最新事例，这在使联合国妇女地位委员会2019年会议脱轨的几乎成功的努力中可见一斑。它研究了跨国女权运动对多边机构的这种反冲的战略反应，包括对新的跨国政策问题的探索和对混合跨国空间的试验。