Abstract In media-centered democracies, political TV interviews can reveal a lot about the relationship between journalists and politicians. However, knowledge about these formats during non-election times is lacking. Against this background, this study aims to generate insights about specific conversation strategies, the staging of politics, and agenda control in a long-term comparison, and to link them with media logic, which has been identified as a factor that shapes agenda-setting strategies in related contexts. Following a static-dynamic approach, a quantitative content analysis was conducted for all statements (N=19,108) from 125 episodes of a specific Austrian interview format in a one-on-one setting broadcast between 1981 and 2016. Regarding the number of statements in which a newly introduced topic is discussed as a measure for agenda control, specific conversation strategies were identified that contribute to a stronger position for journalists. Moreover, specific aspects of media logic help to introduce and anchor a new topic, although their success varies over the decades.

中文翻译：

---

1981-2016年奥地利的政治电视访谈–媒体和政治发生重大变化时的结构和策略

摘要在以媒体为中心的民主国家中，政治电视采访可以揭示很多新闻工作者与政客之间的关系。但是，缺乏关于非选举期间这些格式的知识。在此背景下，本研究旨在通过长期比较来获取有关特定对话策略，政治阶段和议程控制的见解，并将它们与媒体逻辑联系起来，而媒体逻辑已被认为是影响议程设置的因素相关情境中的策略。遵循静态-动态方法，对1981年至2016年间一对一播出的特定奥地利采访格式的125集中的所有陈述（N = 19,108）进行了定量内容分析。关于讨论新引入的话题以控制议程的言论的数量，确定了特定的对话策略，这些策略有助于增强记者的地位。此外，媒体逻辑的特定方面有助于引入和定位新主题，尽管它们的成功在过去几十年中变化很大。