Judicial divorce symbolises women’s resistance to the domination of local interpretations and practices of Muslim family law in Lombok, such as male arbitrary repudiation and polygamy. In this pattern, husbands hold the privilege to terminate marital unions unilaterally and remarry without their wives’ consent. These practices find their grounds in classical-medieval Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), which is endorsed by the custom of patriarchal society. It is by turning to the court that women attempt to subvert such hegemonic discourses. By examining divorce cases from the religious courts, and looking at their broader socio-religious and cultural contexts, this study attempts to propose an analysis of judicial divorce as a locus of women’s resistance against male domination endorsed by local practices of Islamic law, customary law and state law, and examines an important dimension of contemporary practice of Islamic family law, which reveals patterns of domination and resistance.

中文翻译：

---

伊斯兰法与统治与抵抗的悖论

司法离婚象征着女性抵制龙目岛当地对穆斯林家庭法的解释和实践的支配，例如男性任意否认和一夫多妻制。在这种模式下，丈夫有权在未经妻子同意的情况下单方面终止婚姻关系并再婚。这些做法在古典-中世纪伊斯兰法学 (fiqh) 中找到了它们的根据，该法学得到了父权社会习俗的认可。正是通过诉诸法庭，女性才试图颠覆这种霸权话语。通过审查宗教法庭的离婚案件，并审视其更广泛的社会宗教和文化背景，本研究试图提出一项分析，将司法离婚作为妇女抵抗男性统治的场所，并得到当地伊斯兰法、习惯法和和州法律，