当前位置: X-MOL 学术The American Journal of Economics and Sociology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Debating Free International Trade
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology ( IF 1.103 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-03 , DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12310
Gerard Strange

This article begins with a definition of free international trade and a brief history of the evolution of free trade as an ideology and economic policy. It next considers the case for free trade as first articulated by classical economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo and then examines free trade critiques proffered by Friedrich List and Marxist scholars who claim that free trade can never be just nor fair so long as relational and structural power inequalities exist between corporations and workers. This article concludes with a summary of the current free trade debate, highlighting, in particular, how radical critics of free trade have begun to embrace a more distinctly Marxian view of the dynamics of globalized capital accumulation. This new perspective acknowledges the progressive transformations that globalized trade has brought to developing countries while also highlighting the ways global free trade relies upon and sustains an exploitative class dynamic.

中文翻译:

辩论自由国际贸易

本文从对自由国际贸易的定义开始,并简要介绍了自由贸易作为一种意识形态和经济政策的演变历史。接下来,它考虑了古典经济学家亚当·斯密和大卫·里卡多首先提出的自由贸易案例,然后研究了弗里德里希·李斯特和马克思主义学者提出的自由贸易评论,他们声称,只要关系和结构力量自由,贸易就永远是不公正也不公平的。公司与工人之间存在不平等。本文最后总结了当前的自由贸易辩论,特别着重指出,激进的自由贸易评论家如何开始接受马克思主义关于全球化资本积累动态的更为鲜明的观点。
更新日期:2020-02-03
down
wechat
bug