Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity levels of BOT2-BF and BOT2-SF tests applied to children with developmental dyslexia and to examine their clinical usability. This study was designed as a case-controlled study. 82 (study group 41, control group 41) 7–12 year children were included. The study occurred three stages. In the first place, the similarities and differences of BOT2-BF and BOT2-SF tests observed in clinical practices were examined by taking the feedback of experts and test correlations. In the second step, BOT2-BF and BOT2-SF tests were examined with reference to the Core Outcome Set (COS) evaluation criteria. In the last step, in order to examine the sensitivity and specificity levels of the tests, assessments were performed in two groups with 1-week intervals. According to the COS results, the BOT2-BF test was examined better than the BOT2-SF test under cross-cultural validity title. The sensitivity and specificity of BOT2-SF were 0.92 and 0.51, and for BOT2-BF were 0.92 and 0.41, respectively. This study will help clinicians working on children with developmental dyslexia to decide the type of test they will use to evaluate and easy access to materials motor proficiency.

摘要

我们研究的目的是确定应用于发育性阅读障碍儿童的 BOT2-BF 和 BOT2-SF 测试的敏感性和特异性水平，并检查其临床可用性。本研究设计为病例对照研究。包括 82 名（研究组 41，对照组 41）7-12 岁儿童。该研究分为三个阶段。首先，通过专家的反馈和测试相关性来检验临床实践中观察到的BOT2-BF和BOT2-SF测试的异同。第二步，参照核心结果集 (COS) 评估标准检查 BOT2-BF 和 BOT2-SF 测试。在最后一步，为了检查测试的敏感性和特异性水平，以 1 周的间隔对两组进行评估。根据COS结果，在跨文化有效性标题下，BOT2-BF 测试优于 BOT2-SF 测试。BOT2-SF 的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.92 和 0.51，BOT2-BF 分别为 0.92 和 0.41。这项研究将帮助从事发育性阅读障碍儿童工作的临床医生决定他们将用于评估的测试类型，以及轻松获得材料运动能力。