In the interdisciplinary volume, Resolving Displacement and Building Peace: Beyond Beneficiaries, editors Megan Bradley, James Milner and Blair Peruniak call for analysis of refugee perspectives and ‘strategies utilized by people confronted with what appear to be impossible choices’. They note that international organizations increasingly and routinely seek to involve refugees and IDPs in peacebuilding, post-conflict development, reconstruction processes and in displacement resolutions. However, the development of international norms and standards that require refugee participation and consultation based on international human rights principles has not shifted their overall approach or the discourse that frames refugees as beneficiaries. Policy that labels refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPS) as beneficiaries tends to obscure the significant efforts of refugees and IDPs to influence political processes to resolve conflict and displacement. As such, refugee access to durable solutions continues to be limited.

中文翻译：

---

难民在解决流离失所和建立和平中的作用：受益人之外。由华盛顿特区的梅根·布拉德利（Megan Bradley），詹姆斯·米尔纳（James Milner）和布莱尔·佩鲁尼亚克（Blair Peruniak）编辑：乔治敦大学出版社，2019年。第321 LCNN 2018038734

在跨学科卷中，《解决流离失所与建立和平：超越受益者》，编辑梅根·布拉德利（Megan Bradley），詹姆斯·米尔纳（James Milner）和布莱尔·佩鲁纳克（Blair Peruniak）呼吁对难民的观点和“面临似乎不可能选择的人们所利用的战略”进行分析。他们指出，国际组织越来越经常地寻求使难民和国内流离失所者参与建设和平，冲突后发展，重建进程和流离失所决议。但是，要求难民参与和根据国际人权原则进行协商的国际规范和标准的发展并未改变其总体方针或以难民为受益人的论述。将难民和国内流离失所者（IDPS）标记为受益人的政策往往掩盖了难民和国内流离失所者为解决冲突和流离失所的政治进程做出的巨大努力。因此，难民获得持久解决办法的机会继续受到限制。