当前位置: X-MOL 学术Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Normative and Maladaptive Personality Traits and Self-Reported Executive Functioning
Assessment ( IF 4.282 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-29 , DOI: 10.1177/1073191120981762
Scott Roye 1 , Matthew Calamia 1 , Peter J Castagna 1 , Stephen L Aita 2 , Benjamin D Hill 2
Affiliation  

Research on self-reported executive functioning (EF) and personality has largely focused on normative personality traits. While previous research has demonstrated that maladaptive personality traits are associated with performance-based EF, the literature examining the relationship between these traits and self-reported EF is limited. The current study examined the relationship between multiple domains of self-reported EF (Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale) and both normative (The International Personality Item Pool–NEO–120 Item [IPIP-120]) and maladaptive (Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Short Form [PID-5-SF]) personality traits in an undergraduate student sample (n = 354). Similar to past research, relationships were largest across EF domains for both measures related to neuroticism (i.e., IPIP-120 neuroticism and PID-5-SF negative affectivity) and conscientiousness (i.e., IPIP-120 conscientiousness and PID-5-SF disinhibition). Normative personality traits generally accounted for greater variance in EF when examined alone and were also generally associated with greater incremental validity when compared with maladaptive personality traits. However, multiple regression analyses indicated that maladaptive personality traits added unique predictive variance above and beyond normative personality traits in their association with multiple domains of EF. These results highlight the utility of assessing both normative and maladaptive personality traits as well as multiple domains of EF to more fully understand the relationship between personality and EF.



中文翻译:

规范和适应不良的人格特征和自我报告的执行功能

对自我报告的执行功能(EF)和人格的研究主要集中在规范的人格特征上。虽然先前的研究表明,适应不良的人格特质与基于绩效的 EF 相关,但研究这些特质与自我报告 EF 之间关系的文献是有限的。目前的研究检查了自我报告的 EF(执行功能量表中的巴克利缺陷)的多个领域与规范(国际人格项目池-NEO-120 项目 [IPIP-120])和适应不良(DSM-的人格量表)之间的关系。 5 – Short Form [PID-5-SF]) 本科生样本中的人格特征 ( n= 354)。与过去的研究相似,在与神经质(即,IPIP-120 神经质和 PID-5-SF 消极情感)和责任心(即,IPIP-120 责任心和 PID-5-SF 去抑制)相关的测量中,跨 EF 域的关系最大. 当单独检查时,规范的人格特质通常会导致 EF 的更大差异,并且与适应不良的人格特质相比,通常也与更大的增量效度相关。然而,多元回归分析表明,在与 EF 多个领域的关联中,适应不良的人格特征在规范人格特征之外增加了独特的预测方差。

更新日期:2021-01-04
down
wechat
bug