ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives

This research identified profiles characterized by distinct levels of overcommitment, rumination, psychological detachment (Studies 1 and 2), and need for recovery (Study 2). This research also considers the role of hindrance demands and resources in the prediction of profile membership, and the outcomes of these profiles.

Methods

These objectives were addressed in two empirical cross-sectional studies relying on self-reported questionnaires. Study 1 relies on a convenience sample of French workers from a variety of occupations. Study 2 relies on a convenience sample of French nurses and nursing assistants.

Results

Latent profile analyses revealed four identical profiles in both studies (High Ability to Achieve Recovery, Moderately High Ability to Achieve Recovery, Moderately Low Ability to Achieve Recovery, and Low Ability to Achieve Recovery), accompanied by an additional (Normative) profile in Study 2. The results from both studies revealed well-differentiated outcome associations, which generally matched the theoretical desirability of the identified profiles. Likewise, hindrance demands were associated with a decreased likelihood of membership into the High Ability to Achieve Recovery profile, as well as an increased likelihood of membership into the Low Ability to Achieve Recovery profile across studies.

Conclusions

Theoretical contributions and implications for practice are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

关于与工作恢复过程相关的因素的以人为中心的观点

摘要

背景和目标

该研究确定了以不同程度的过度承诺、沉思、心理疏离（研究 1 和 2）和需要恢复（研究 2）为特征的特征。本研究还考虑了障碍需求和资源在预测轮廓成员资格以及这些轮廓的结果中的作用。

方法

这些目标在两项基于自我报告问卷的实证横断面研究中得到解决。研究 1 依赖于来自各种职业的法国工人的便利样本。研究 2 依赖于法国护士和护理助理的便利样本。

结果

潜在的个人资料分析显示四个相同的配置文件中的两项研究（高能力实现复苏，适度高能力实现复苏，中低能力实现复苏，以及低能力实现复苏），伴随着额外的（规范性研究2）简介. 两项研究的结果都揭示了差异很大的结果关联，这通常与已识别配置文件的理论合意性相匹配。同样，障碍要求与成为实现恢复能力高的人的可能性降低以及成为跨研究实现恢复的能力低。

结论

讨论了理论贡献和对实践的影响。