当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Student pacing in a master's level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis ( IF 2.809 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-30 , DOI: 10.1002/jaba.806
Zachary Bird 1 , Philip N Chase 1
Affiliation  

Previous research has shown that many students procrastinate, but wish that they did not do so. The current study replicated research that compared distribution of studying under contingent access to study materials and noncontingent access to study materials in a graduate-level course (Perrin et al., 2011). It extended Perrin et al. (2011) in three ways. First, it evaluated preference for the treatment using a choice procedure; second, the choice procedure allowed for the elimination of an order confound; and third, different measures were used to evaluate performance results. Although contingent access to study materials was successful at reducing procrastination, students typically chose the noncontingent access condition. Preference on the end-of-semester survey aligned with choices made throughout the semester. The data are discussed in terms of implications and recommendations for future research regarding the design of graduate coursework to address student pacing along with student and professor preference.

中文翻译:

硕士课程中的学生步调:拖延、偏好和表现

以前的研究表明,许多学生拖延,但希望他们没有这样做。当前的研究重复了一项研究,该研究比较了研究生课程中根据条件获取学习材料和非条件获取学习材料的分布情况(Perrin 等,2011)。它扩展了 Perrin 等人。(2011) 以三种方式。首先,它使用选择程序评估对治疗的偏好;第二,选择程序允许消除订单混淆;第三,使用不同的措施来评估绩效结果。尽管随机访问学习材料成功地减少了拖延,但学生通常选择非随机访问条件。对学期末调查的偏好与整个学期所做的选择一致。
更新日期:2020-12-30
down
wechat
bug