We analyzed the psychometric properties of the Structured Interview for the Five-Factor Model (SIFFM) in a French-speaking Swiss sample and compared the French version to the original English version. A community-based sample of 260 participants (183 women and 77 men, aged 20 to 88 years, Mage = 46.23, SDage = 16.37) were assessed using the SIFFM and the NEO-FFI-R. Forty of the participants agreed to be filmed or to be assessed by two investigators simultaneously. The internal consistency coefficients of the five dimensions of SIFFM ranged from .63 to .84. An exploratory factor analysis within the confirmatory factor analysis framework showed that the structure of the French version of the SIFFM was in line with the structure suggested by the Five-Factor Model. Except for the modesty and dutifulness subscales, each facet scale had its highest factor loading on the factor representing the targeted domain. Moreover, a principal axis joint factor analysis of the SIFFM and NEO-FFI-R domains suggested that the convergent validity between the two instruments was adequate. Furthermore, the interrater reliability coefficients for the SIFFM scores were high. The French version of the SIFFM shows acceptable psychometric properties, comparable to those of the English version, and may be an informative assessment method and an alternative to self-report measures.

中文翻译：

---

在瑞士样本中验证适用于五因素模型 (SIFFM) 的结构化面试的改编法语形式

我们在一个讲法语的瑞士样本中分析了五因素模型（SIFFM）的结构化面试的心理测量特性，并将法语版本与原始英文版本进行了比较。使用 SIFFM 和 NEO-FFI-R 评估了 260 名参与者（183 名女性和 77 名男性，年龄在 20 至 88 岁，法师 = 46.23，SDage = 16.37）的基于社区的样本。40 名参与者同意由两名调查人员同时拍摄或评估。SIFFM 五个维度的内部一致性系数在 0.63 到 0.84 之间。验证性因子分析框架内的探索性因子分析表明，法语版 SIFFM 的结构与五因子模型建议的结构一致。除了谦虚和尽职的分量表，每个方面的尺度在代表目标域的因素上都有最高的因素负荷。此外，对 SIFFM 和 NEO-FFI-R 域的主轴联合因子分析表明，这两种工具之间的收敛效度是足够的。此外，SIFFM 评分的交互者可靠性系数很高。法语版的 SIFFM 显示出可接受的心理测量特性，与英语版相当，并且可能是一种信息性评估方法和自我报告测量的替代方法。