The cognitive reflection test (CRT) has been popular because it has demonstrated a good predictive validity of a variety of biases in judgment and decision making. Thomson and Oppenheimer (2016) further developed a second version of the cognitive reflection test, CRT2. Although CRT-2 has been found to be associated with several biases in judgment and decision making, its relationship with intertemporal choice remains unclear. Previous studies have shown that intertemporal choice characterizes the competition between intuition and reflection, and can be predicted by the original CRT. To further validate CRT-2, the present study tests the relationship between CRT-2 and intertemporal choice. The study finds that better performance on CRT-2 is significantly associated with fewer impulsive intertemporal choices in both gain and payment conditions. Moreover, impulsive choices are related to intuitive errors but not nonintuitive errors generated from CRT-2. The study suggests that CRT-2 provides some more items for researchers to select to characterize individual differences in thinking style and judgment and decision making.

中文翻译：

---

认知反射测试的替代形式与跨期选择之间的关系

认知反思测试 (CRT) 之所以流行，是因为它已证明对判断和决策中的各种偏见具有良好的预测效度。Thomson 和 Oppenheimer (2016) 进一步开发了认知反射测试的第二个版本，CRT2。尽管已发现 CRT-2 与判断和决策中的若干偏见有关，但其与跨期选择的关系仍不清楚。以往的研究表明，跨期选择表征了直觉和反思之间的竞争，并且可以通过原始 CRT 进行预测。为了进一步验证 CRT-2，本研究测试了 CRT-2 与跨期选择之间的关系。该研究发现，在 CRT-2 上的更好表现与收益和支付条件中较少的冲动跨期选择显着相关。此外，冲动选择与直觉错误有关，但与 CRT-2 产生的非直觉错误无关。研究表明，CRT-2 提供了更多的项目供研究人员选择，以表征思维方式、判断和决策方面的个体差异。