当前位置: X-MOL 学术Social Cognition › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Saving the Robot or the Human? Robots Who Feel Deserve Moral Care
Social Cognition ( IF 1.636 ) Pub Date : 2019-02-01 , DOI: 10.1521/soco.2019.37.1.41
Sari R. R. Nijssen 1 , Barbara C. N. Müller 1 , Rick B. van Baaren 1 , Markus Paulus 2
Affiliation  

Robots are becoming an integral part of society, yet our moral stance toward these non-living objects is unclear. In two experiments, we investigated whether anthropomorphic appearance and anthropomorphic attributions modulated people's utilitarian decision making about robotic agents. In Study 1, participants were presented with moral dilemmas in which the to-be-sacrificed agent was either a human, a human-like robot, or a machine-like robot. These victims were described in either neutral or anthropomorphic priming stories. Study 2 teased apart anthropomorphic attributions of agency and affect. Results indicate that although robot-like robots were sacrificed significantly more often than humans and humanlike robots, the effect of humanized priming was the same for all three agent types (Study 1), and this effect was mainly due to the attribution of affective states rather than agency (Study 2). That is, when people attribute affective states to robots, they are less likely to sacrifice them in order to save humans.

中文翻译:

拯救机器人还是人类?值得道德关怀的机器人

机器人正在成为社会不可或缺的一部分,但是我们对于这些非生命物体的道德立场尚不清楚。在两个实验中,我们研究了拟人化的外观和拟人化的归因是否会调节人们对机器人代理的功利性决策。在研究1中,向参与者展示了道德困境,其中待牺牲的代理人是人,类人机器人或类机器机器人。这些受害者在中性或拟人的启动故事中都有描述。研究2提出了代理和情感的拟人化属性。结果表明,尽管像人一样的机器人被牺牲的次数明显多于人类和类人的机器人,但是对于所有三种媒介类型,人性化引发的效果是相同的(研究1),这种影响主要是由于情感国家的归属而不是代理(研究2)。也就是说,当人们将情感状态归因于机器人时,他们为了牺牲人类而牺牲它们的可能性较小。
更新日期:2019-02-01
down
wechat
bug