当前位置: X-MOL 学术Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Accommodation Request Strategies Among Employees With Disabilities: Impacts and Associated Factors
Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin ( IF 1.290 ) Pub Date : 2019-03-06 , DOI: 10.1177/0034355219834630
Shengli Dong 1 , Paul Geyer 2 , Tameisha Hinton 1 , Arizona Chin 1
Affiliation  

The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of different workplace accommodation request strategies, the effectiveness of different request approaches, and situational and individual factors associated with different request strategies for individuals with disabilities. Common action plans of accommodation requests may vary depending on decisions about mentioning the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) (or not) and whether a formal (or informal) request is submitted, though past literature has focused primarily on formal accommodation requests made under the auspices of the ADA. Participants (n = 408) were recruited from rehabilitation agencies and organizations serving people with disabilities in the United States. The results indicated that informal requests without mentioning the ADA were found most often, followed by formal requests while not mentioning the ADA, formal requests while mentioning the ADA, and informal requests while mentioning the ADA. The odds of acquiring the requested accommodation were significantly higher, relative to other strategies, for requests made informally without mentioning the ADA. A variety of individual attributes capable of discerning when participants chose one strategy over another were observed; these included self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, negative affect, and an array of situational and personal attributes. Implications for research and practice were discussed.

中文翻译:

残疾员工的住宿申请策略:影响和相关因素

本研究的目的是检查不同工作场所住宿请求策略的普遍性、不同请求方法的有效性以及与针对残疾人的不同请求策略相关的情境和个人因素。住宿请求的常见行动计划可能会有所不同,具体取决于是否提及美国残疾人法案 (ADA) 以及是否提交正式(或非正式)请求,尽管过去的文献主要关注根据《美国残疾人法案》提出的正式住宿请求。 ADA 的主持。参与者(n = 408)是从美国为残疾人服务的康复机构和组织中招募的。结果表明,最常见的是未提及 ADA 的非正式请求,其次是正式请求但不提及 ADA,正式请求时提及 ADA,以及非正式请求时提及 ADA。与其他策略相比,对于未提及 ADA 的非正式请求,获得所请求住宿的几率要高得多。观察到了各种能够辨别参与者何时选择一种策略而不是另一种策略的个人属性;这些包括自我效能和结果预期、负面影响以及一系列情境和个人属性。讨论了对研究和实践的影响。对于不提及 ADA 的非正式请求。观察到了各种能够辨别参与者何时选择一种策略而不是另一种策略的个人属性;这些包括自我效能和结果预期、负面影响以及一系列情境和个人属性。讨论了对研究和实践的影响。对于不提及 ADA 的非正式请求。观察到了各种能够辨别参与者何时选择一种策略而不是另一种策略的个人属性;这些包括自我效能和结果预期、负面影响以及一系列情境和个人属性。讨论了对研究和实践的影响。
更新日期:2019-03-06
down
wechat
bug