当前位置: X-MOL 学术Public Policy and Administration › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services: Does the governance mode matter?
Public Policy and Administration ( IF 2.909 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-11 , DOI: 10.1177/0952076720905006
Elke Loeffler 1 , Peter Timm-Arnold 2
Affiliation  

This paper analyses the relationship between modes of governance at local level and the adoption of user and community co-production approaches in community safety and social care services, based on a German case study. The findings draw on a series of intensive focus groups with managers and staff of public services in four different regions in Germany, exploring existing levels of co-production and its potential in social care and community safety services, with particular focus on older and young people. The paper provides the first clear research evidence on how approaches to co-production are specific to the modes of governance within which they take place. The paper concludes with policy conclusions, both in the two programme areas concerned and in local public services more generally.

中文翻译:

比较当地“福利”和“法律与秩序”服务中的用户和社区联合生产方法:治理模式重要吗?

本文基于德国案例研究,分析了地方层面的治理模式与在社区安全和社会关怀服务中采用用户和社区共同生产方法之间的关系。调查结果借鉴了德国四个不同地区的公共服务经理和工作人员的一系列密集焦点小组,探讨了现有的联合生产水平及其在社会关怀和社区安全服务方面的潜力,特别关注老年人和年轻人. 该论文提供了第一个明确的研究证据,说明联合生产的方法如何特定于它们发生的治理模式。论文最后给出了两个相关项目领域和更普遍的地方公共服务领域的政策结论。
更新日期:2020-02-11
down
wechat
bug