Nine postdoctoral-level experienced psychodynamic supervisors were interviewed about working with a supervisee on a case involving parallel process (PP) that started in therapy and was enacted in supervision. Consensual qualitative research was used to analyze transcripts of the interviews. The general pattern that emerged from the analysis of the supervisors' reports was that clients behaved unusually in session, therapists "got hooked" by this change, therapists enacted the client's behavior in supervision, supervisors "got hooked," supervisors reflected on their reactions and intervened in a different way; reported outcomes were mostly positive (e.g., enhanced growth or understanding for the therapist). Results of this qualitative investigation provide evidence of PP and clues as to how experienced supervisors observe, describe, and respond to PP in ways that promote growth, insight, and understanding for their supervisees. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

心理动力监督中的并行过程：监督者的观点。

采访了九名博士后级别的经验丰富的心理动力学监督员，他们与一名监督员合作处理了一个始于治疗并在监督中实施的涉及并行程序（PP）的案件。自愿性定性研究用于分析访谈的笔录。从对主管报告的分析中得出的一般模式是，客户在会议中表现异常，治疗师因这种变化“迷上了”，治疗师在监督中制定了客户的行为，主管“迷上了”，主管对他们的反应和反思进行了反思。以不同的方式进行干预；报告的结果大多是积极的（例如，增长或对治疗师的了解）。该定性调查的结果提供了PP的证据，以及有关经验丰富的主管如何观察，描述和响应PP的线索，这些方法可以促进其被监督者的成长，洞察力和理解。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。