当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Psychology of Violence
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A systematic review of community-based research interventions for domestic violence survivors.
Psychology of Violence ( IF 3.746 ) Pub Date : 2019-03-01 , DOI: 10.1037/vio0000183 Maya I. Ragavan , Kristie Thomas , Julia Medzhitova , Nathan Brewer , Lisa A. Goodman , Megan Bair-Merritt
Psychology of Violence ( IF 3.746 ) Pub Date : 2019-03-01 , DOI: 10.1037/vio0000183 Maya I. Ragavan , Kristie Thomas , Julia Medzhitova , Nathan Brewer , Lisa A. Goodman , Megan Bair-Merritt
Objectives: Community-based research is a broad approach in which researchers work closely with practitioners and community members to enhance the understanding of a given phenomenon and promote positive outcomes. In the domestic violence (DV) field, community-based research is a particularly useful strategy to develop and evaluate interventions that address unique community needs. Despite the potential benefits of this approach, to our knowledge, no systematic review has synthesized DV-focused interventions and evaluations designed using a community-based research approach. This study aimed to fill that gap. Method: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, retrieving articles that described the collaborative development and evaluation of interventions for DV survivors residing in the United States. Articles were identified from peer-reviewed databases, bibliographies, and experts. Twenty of the 199 articles assessed for eligibility were included. Results: Interventions primarily consisted of small-group sessions focusing on survivors’ mental health and safety needs. Evaluations focused on process metrics, although approximately half reported changes in survivors’ outcomes. Collaboration generally occurred between DV advocates and applied health care academic teams. Authors described the promotion of collaboration in multiple ways and to varying degrees. Common examples included shared decision-making, recognizing and addressing potential power imbalances, longitudinal relationship building, changing programs based on stakeholder feedback, and co-owned project outputs including coauthorship of manuscripts. Conclusions: This is the first systematic review of interventions to support DV survivors, developed using a community-based research approach. Implications include promoting community-based outcome evaluations and developing guidelines for teams publishing community-based research in the peer-reviewed literature.
中文翻译:
对基于社区的针对家庭暴力幸存者的研究干预措施的系统评价。
目标:基于社区的研究是一种广泛的方法,研究人员可以与从业者和社区成员紧密合作,以增进对特定现象的理解并促进积极成果。在家庭暴力(DV)领域,基于社区的研究是开发和评估可满足社区独特需求的干预措施的特别有用的策略。尽管此方法具有潜在的好处,但据我们所知,没有系统的综述可以综合使用基于社区的研究方法设计的以DV为重点的干预措施和评估。这项研究旨在填补这一空白。方法:使用首选报告项进行系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,我们对文献进行了系统评价,检索了描述居住在美国的DV幸存者的协作开发和干预措施评估的文章。从经过同行评审的数据库,书目和专家中确定文章。评估合格的199篇文章中有20篇。结果:干预主要包括小组会议,重点是幸存者的心理健康和安全需求。评估着重于过程指标,尽管大约一半报告了幸存者结果的变化。DV倡导者和应用医疗保健学术团队之间通常进行协作。作者描述了以多种方式在不同程度上促进协作。常见的示例包括共同决策,识别和解决潜在的权力不平衡,建立纵向关系,根据利益相关者的反馈以及共同拥有的项目成果(包括手稿的共同作者)来更改程序。结论:这是首次使用社区研究方法对支持DV幸存者的干预措施进行系统评价。含义包括促进基于社区的成果评估,以及为团队发布在同行评审文献中发表基于社区的研究的指南。
更新日期:2019-03-01
中文翻译:
对基于社区的针对家庭暴力幸存者的研究干预措施的系统评价。
目标:基于社区的研究是一种广泛的方法,研究人员可以与从业者和社区成员紧密合作,以增进对特定现象的理解并促进积极成果。在家庭暴力(DV)领域,基于社区的研究是开发和评估可满足社区独特需求的干预措施的特别有用的策略。尽管此方法具有潜在的好处,但据我们所知,没有系统的综述可以综合使用基于社区的研究方法设计的以DV为重点的干预措施和评估。这项研究旨在填补这一空白。方法:使用首选报告项进行系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,我们对文献进行了系统评价,检索了描述居住在美国的DV幸存者的协作开发和干预措施评估的文章。从经过同行评审的数据库,书目和专家中确定文章。评估合格的199篇文章中有20篇。结果:干预主要包括小组会议,重点是幸存者的心理健康和安全需求。评估着重于过程指标,尽管大约一半报告了幸存者结果的变化。DV倡导者和应用医疗保健学术团队之间通常进行协作。作者描述了以多种方式在不同程度上促进协作。常见的示例包括共同决策,识别和解决潜在的权力不平衡,建立纵向关系,根据利益相关者的反馈以及共同拥有的项目成果(包括手稿的共同作者)来更改程序。结论:这是首次使用社区研究方法对支持DV幸存者的干预措施进行系统评价。含义包括促进基于社区的成果评估,以及为团队发布在同行评审文献中发表基于社区的研究的指南。